Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Chris Pronger Nate Prosser

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Pronger: Goals, 0.08 a game, 69th percentileChris Pronger: Assists, 0.85 a game, 99th percentileChris Pronger: Points, 0.92 a game, 99th percentileChris Pronger: Shots, 1.77 a game, 80th percentileChris Pronger: Hits, 1.15 a game, 49th percentileChris Pronger: Corsi for %, 51.5%, 69th percentileChris Pronger: CF% rel, 4.2, 92nd percentileChris Pronger: On-ice xG %, 60.3%, 99th percentileChris Pronger: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 60th percentileChris Pronger: Chances created, 0.16 xG per 60, 41st percentileChris Pronger: Shot quality, 2.9% a shot, 36th percentileChris Pronger: Finishing, +0.2 goals above expected, 65th percentileNate Prosser: Goals, 0.02 a game, 20th percentileNate Prosser: Assists, 0.22 a game, 53rd percentileNate Prosser: Points, 0.24 a game, 46th percentileNate Prosser: Shots, 0.63 a game, 11th percentileNate Prosser: Hits, 0.67 a game, 16th percentileNate Prosser: Corsi for %, 43.6%, 3rd percentileNate Prosser: CF% rel, -1.4, 37th percentileNate Prosser: On-ice xG %, 41.9%, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Rating, -2.2 goals above replacement, 9th percentileNate Prosser: Chances created, 0.13 xG per 60, 29th percentileNate Prosser: Shot quality, 4.4% a shot, 93rd percentileNate Prosser: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 30th percentile
05102040Chris Pronger 12Nate Prosser 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Pronger
Nate Prosser

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Pronger D, PHI 2011-12 Nate Prosser D, PHI
13 Games played 51
1 Goals 1
11 Assists 11
12 Points 12
0.92 Points per game 0.24
1 Plus/minus -17
23 Shots 32
4.3 Shooting % 3.1
15 Hits 34
10 Penalty minutes 57
22:29 Average ice time 19:15
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.5 Corsi for % 43.6
+4.2 CF% relative to team -1.4
52.5 Fenwick for % 44.7
60.3 Expected goals for % 41.9
+8.7 xGF% relative to team -6.3
69.2 Goals for % 35.7
104.0 PDO 97.4
24 Shot attempts taken 59
Expected goals, all situations
0.8 Expected goals 2.1
0.16 Expected goals per 60 0.13
2.9% Chance per attempt 4.4%
+0.2 Goals above expected -1.1
Rating, in goals
+2.5 Goals above replacement -2.2
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.4
+0.1 Even-strength offence -1.9
+0.8 Even-strength defence -1.9
+0.7 Power play -0.1
+0.3 Penalty kill -0.1
-0.5 Penalties -1.5
Contract
$4.936M Cap hit $715K
$411K Cap dollars per point $60K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean