Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Richard Park Gilbert Brule

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRichard Park: Goals, 0.13 a game, 41st percentileRichard Park: Assists, 0.13 a game, 29th percentileRichard Park: Points, 0.26 a game, 33rd percentileRichard Park: Shots, 0.81 a game, 10th percentileRichard Park: Hits, 0.52 a game, 15th percentileRichard Park: Corsi for %, 51.1%, 60th percentileRichard Park: CF% rel, -3.6, 19th percentileRichard Park: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 38th percentileRichard Park: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 21st percentileRichard Park: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 11th percentileRichard Park: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 54th percentileRichard Park: Finishing, +2.3 goals above expected, 70th percentileGilbert Brule: Goals, 0.15 a game, 47th percentileGilbert Brule: Assists, 0.27 a game, 62nd percentileGilbert Brule: Points, 0.42 a game, 55th percentileGilbert Brule: Shots, 1.70 a game, 53rd percentileGilbert Brule: Hits, 1.67 a game, 78th percentileGilbert Brule: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 42nd percentileGilbert Brule: CF% rel, 0.8, 56th percentileGilbert Brule: On-ice xG %, 49.6%, 48th percentileGilbert Brule: Rating, +2.9 goals above replacement, 53rd percentileGilbert Brule: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 53rd percentileGilbert Brule: Shot quality, 6.0% a shot, 13th percentileGilbert Brule: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 56th percentile
05102040Richard Park 14Gilbert Brule 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Richard Park
Gilbert Brule

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Richard Park R, PIT 2011-12 Gilbert Brule C, PHX
54 Games played 33
7 Goals 5
7 Assists 9
14 Points 14
0.26 Points per game 0.42
-1 Plus/minus 7
44 Shots 56
15.9 Shooting % 8.9
28 Hits 55
12 Penalty minutes 11
10:55 Average ice time 11:34
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.1 Corsi for % 49.3
-3.6 CF% relative to team +0.8
51.8 Fenwick for % 49.7
48.5 Expected goals for % 49.6
-5.4 xGF% relative to team +0.4
48.6 Goals for % 60.6
99.2 PDO 105.1
76 Shot attempts taken 78
Expected goals, all situations
4.7 Expected goals 4.6
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.72
7.6% Chance per attempt 6.0%
+2.3 Goals above expected +0.4
Rating, in goals
-0.2 Goals above replacement +2.9
0.0 Wins above replacement +0.5
-2.3 Even-strength offence +0.6
-0.4 Even-strength defence +0.8
+0.3 Power play -0.3
+0.2 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.4 Penalties +0.7

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean