Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Matt Cullen Riley Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatt Cullen: Goals, 0.11 a game, 29th percentileMatt Cullen: Assists, 0.29 a game, 63rd percentileMatt Cullen: Points, 0.40 a game, 48th percentileMatt Cullen: Shots, 1.45 a game, 38th percentileMatt Cullen: Hits, 0.16 a game, 1st percentileMatt Cullen: Corsi for %, 53.5%, 77th percentileMatt Cullen: CF% rel, -0.1, 45th percentileMatt Cullen: On-ice xG %, 56.3%, 89th percentileMatt Cullen: Rating, +3.7 goals above replacement, 56th percentileMatt Cullen: Chances created, 0.67 xG per 60, 43rd percentileMatt Cullen: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 37th percentileMatt Cullen: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 32nd percentileRiley Nash: Goals, 0.12 a game, 30th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.25 a game, 54th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.37 a game, 42nd percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.38 a game, 35th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.29 a game, 53rd percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.9%, 71st percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, 1.1, 58th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 53.2%, 69th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +7.7 goals above replacement, 81st percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 51st percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 10.7% a shot, 99th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -5.3 goals above expected, 6th percentile
0510152025204060Matt Cullen 25Riley Nash 25

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matt Cullen
Riley Nash

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matt Cullen C, PIT 2014-15 Riley Nash C, NYR
62 Games played 68
7 Goals 8
18 Assists 17
25 Points 25
0.40 Points per game 0.37
8 Plus/minus -10
90 Shots 94
7.8 Shooting % 8.5
10 Hits 88
16 Penalty minutes 12
13:01 Average ice time 16:19
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.5 Corsi for % 52.9
-0.1 CF% relative to team +1.1
54.4 Fenwick for % 52.0
56.3 Expected goals for % 53.2
+2.0 xGF% relative to team +2.7
58.9 Goals for % 44.8
101.6 PDO 97.7
143 Shot attempts taken 126
Expected goals, all situations
9.1 Expected goals 13.3
0.67 Expected goals per 60 0.72
7.0% Chance per attempt 10.7%
-2.1 Goals above expected -5.3
Rating, in goals
+3.7 Goals above replacement +7.7
+0.6 Wins above replacement +1.3
+0.8 Even-strength offence -0.1
+0.7 Even-strength defence +3.6
-0.1 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill +0.7
0.0 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$3.5M Cap hit $575K
$140K Cap dollars per point $23K
$2.8M Worth at the going rate $5.2M
-$712K Value: worth minus cap hit +$4.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean