Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Michal Rozsival Dan Hamhuis

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMichal Rozsival: Goals, 0.02 a game, 20th percentileMichal Rozsival: Assists, 0.24 a game, 66th percentileMichal Rozsival: Points, 0.25 a game, 52nd percentileMichal Rozsival: Shots, 0.80 a game, 18th percentileMichal Rozsival: Hits, 1.59 a game, 65th percentileMichal Rozsival: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 48th percentileMichal Rozsival: CF% rel, 0.0, 52nd percentileMichal Rozsival: On-ice xG %, 46.4%, 17th percentileMichal Rozsival: Rating, -1.4 goals above replacement, 14th percentileMichal Rozsival: Chances created, 0.11 xG per 60, 18th percentileMichal Rozsival: Shot quality, 2.8% a shot, 35th percentileMichal Rozsival: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 42nd percentileDan Hamhuis: Goals, 0.05 a game, 50th percentileDan Hamhuis: Assists, 0.17 a game, 42nd percentileDan Hamhuis: Points, 0.22 a game, 46th percentileDan Hamhuis: Shots, 1.24 a game, 50th percentileDan Hamhuis: Hits, 1.10 a game, 47th percentileDan Hamhuis: Corsi for %, 50.3%, 57th percentileDan Hamhuis: CF% rel, 3.2, 84th percentileDan Hamhuis: On-ice xG %, 48.9%, 40th percentileDan Hamhuis: Rating, +5.8 goals above replacement, 76th percentileDan Hamhuis: Chances created, 0.15 xG per 60, 36th percentileDan Hamhuis: Shot quality, 3.2% a shot, 53rd percentileDan Hamhuis: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 49th percentile
05102040Michal Rozsival 13Dan Hamhuis 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Michal Rozsival
Dan Hamhuis

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Michal Rozsival D, CHI 2015-16 Dan Hamhuis D, NSH
51 Games played 58
1 Goals 3
12 Assists 10
13 Points 13
0.25 Points per game 0.22
3 Plus/minus -2
41 Shots 72
2.4 Shooting % 4.2
81 Hits 64
33 Penalty minutes 28
16:10 Average ice time 21:25
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.8 Corsi for % 50.3
0.0 CF% relative to team +3.2
48.1 Fenwick for % 49.3
46.4 Expected goals for % 48.9
-2.9 xGF% relative to team +7.2
52.6 Goals for % 44.1
101.8 PDO 98.7
80 Shot attempts taken 137
Expected goals, all situations
1.5 Expected goals 3.2
0.11 Expected goals per 60 0.15
2.8% Chance per attempt 3.2%
-0.5 Goals above expected -0.2
Rating, in goals
-1.4 Goals above replacement +5.8
-0.2 Wins above replacement +1.0
-0.8 Even-strength offence +0.4
-2.3 Even-strength defence +2.3
-0.3 Power play -1.0
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.8 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$600K Cap hit $4.5M
$46K Cap dollars per point $346K
-$305K Worth at the going rate $4.3M
-$905K Value: worth minus cap hit -$248K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean