Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Scott Gomez Nate Thompson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerScott Gomez: Goals, 0.05 a game, 12th percentileScott Gomez: Assists, 0.33 a game, 71st percentileScott Gomez: Points, 0.38 a game, 50th percentileScott Gomez: Shots, 1.49 a game, 44th percentileScott Gomez: Hits, 0.10 a game, 1st percentileScott Gomez: Corsi for %, 52.0%, 70th percentileScott Gomez: CF% rel, 0.5, 57th percentileScott Gomez: On-ice xG %, 50.6%, 58th percentileScott Gomez: Rating, -0.9 goals above replacement, 11th percentileScott Gomez: Chances created, 0.74 xG per 60, 57th percentileScott Gomez: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 66th percentileScott Gomez: Finishing, -4.5 goals above expected, 4th percentileNate Thompson: Goals, 0.16 a game, 48th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.18 a game, 41st percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.33 a game, 42nd percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.29 a game, 34th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 1.89 a game, 78th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 44.1%, 11th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -3.7, 20th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 44.5%, 15th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +1.1 goals above replacement, 39th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 14th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 18th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, +1.7 goals above expected, 73rd percentile
0510152040Scott Gomez 15Nate Thompson 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Scott Gomez
Nate Thompson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Scott Gomez C, OTT 2012-13 Nate Thompson C, PHI
39 Games played 45
2 Goals 7
13 Assists 8
15 Points 15
0.38 Points per game 0.33
-10 Plus/minus -2
58 Shots 58
3.4 Shooting % 12.1
4 Hits 85
22 Penalty minutes 17
13:32 Average ice time 14:20
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.0 Corsi for % 44.1
+0.5 CF% relative to team -3.7
51.6 Fenwick for % 45.5
50.6 Expected goals for % 44.5
-4.8 xGF% relative to team -4.4
36.7 Goals for % 47.2
96.4 PDO 100.2
74 Shot attempts taken 97
Expected goals, all situations
6.5 Expected goals 5.3
0.74 Expected goals per 60 0.50
7.9% Chance per attempt 6.4%
-4.5 Goals above expected +1.7
Rating, in goals
-0.9 Goals above replacement +1.1
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.2
-1.6 Even-strength offence -0.2
-0.3 Even-strength defence +0.2
-0.2 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.7
-0.2 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$700K Cap hit $900K
$47K Cap dollars per point $60K
-$250K Worth at the going rate $1.4M
-$950K Value: worth minus cap hit +$549K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean