Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

John Erskine Peter Harrold

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJohn Erskine: Goals, 0.03 a game, 21st percentileJohn Erskine: Assists, 0.08 a game, 7th percentileJohn Erskine: Points, 0.11 a game, 7th percentileJohn Erskine: Shots, 1.03 a game, 32nd percentileJohn Erskine: Hits, 1.73 a game, 68th percentileJohn Erskine: Corsi for %, 45.7%, 15th percentileJohn Erskine: CF% rel, -4.8, 8th percentileJohn Erskine: On-ice xG %, 45.2%, 16th percentileJohn Erskine: Rating, -1.2 goals above replacement, 15th percentileJohn Erskine: Chances created, 0.13 xG per 60, 23rd percentileJohn Erskine: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 16th percentileJohn Erskine: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 47th percentilePeter Harrold: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentilePeter Harrold: Assists, 0.12 a game, 19th percentilePeter Harrold: Points, 0.12 a game, 10th percentilePeter Harrold: Shots, 0.97 a game, 27th percentilePeter Harrold: Hits, 0.52 a game, 8th percentilePeter Harrold: Corsi for %, 54.7%, 88th percentilePeter Harrold: CF% rel, 0.2, 55th percentilePeter Harrold: On-ice xG %, 55.6%, 89th percentilePeter Harrold: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 27th percentilePeter Harrold: Chances created, 0.14 xG per 60, 27th percentilePeter Harrold: Shot quality, 2.9% a shot, 37th percentilePeter Harrold: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 22nd percentile
0123420John Erskine 4Peter Harrold 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

John Erskine
Peter Harrold

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

John Erskine D, WSH 2013-14 Peter Harrold D, NJD
37 Games played 33
1 Goals 0
3 Assists 4
4 Points 4
0.11 Points per game 0.12
-5 Plus/minus -2
38 Shots 32
2.6 Shooting % 0.0
64 Hits 17
56 Penalty minutes 14
15:36 Average ice time 18:40
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.7 Corsi for % 54.7
-4.8 CF% relative to team +0.2
44.7 Fenwick for % 54.0
45.2 Expected goals for % 55.6
-2.5 xGF% relative to team -3.1
44.7 Goals for % 52.0
99.7 PDO 100.0
76 Shot attempts taken 61
Expected goals, all situations
1.2 Expected goals 1.4
0.13 Expected goals per 60 0.14
2.4% Chance per attempt 2.9%
-0.2 Goals above expected -1.4
Rating, in goals
-1.2 Goals above replacement -0.2
-0.2 Wins above replacement 0.0
-0.5 Even-strength offence -1.9
-0.8 Even-strength defence +0.1
0.0 Power play -0.5
-0.4 Penalty kill +0.1
-1.4 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$1.962M Cap hit $800K
$491K Cap dollars per point $200K
-$172K Worth at the going rate $418K
-$2.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$382K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean