Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

John Erskine David Schlemko

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJohn Erskine: Goals, 0.10 a game, 74th percentileJohn Erskine: Assists, 0.10 a game, 18th percentileJohn Erskine: Points, 0.20 a game, 36th percentileJohn Erskine: Shots, 1.07 a game, 44th percentileJohn Erskine: Hits, 3.03 a game, 97th percentileJohn Erskine: Corsi for %, 45.4%, 11th percentileJohn Erskine: CF% rel, -2.4, 27th percentileJohn Erskine: On-ice xG %, 45.6%, 16th percentileJohn Erskine: Rating, -0.9 goals above replacement, 17th percentileJohn Erskine: Chances created, 0.11 xG per 60, 19th percentileJohn Erskine: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 14th percentileJohn Erskine: Finishing, +2.0 goals above expected, 88th percentileDavid Schlemko: Goals, 0.03 a game, 37th percentileDavid Schlemko: Assists, 0.17 a game, 40th percentileDavid Schlemko: Points, 0.20 a game, 36th percentileDavid Schlemko: Shots, 1.17 a game, 52nd percentileDavid Schlemko: Hits, 1.27 a game, 51st percentileDavid Schlemko: Corsi for %, 49.0%, 43rd percentileDavid Schlemko: CF% rel, -2.9, 21st percentileDavid Schlemko: On-ice xG %, 45.7%, 18th percentileDavid Schlemko: Rating, -1.8 goals above replacement, 7th percentileDavid Schlemko: Chances created, 0.24 xG per 60, 77th percentileDavid Schlemko: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 74th percentileDavid Schlemko: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 20th percentile
024620John Erskine 6David Schlemko 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

John Erskine
David Schlemko

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

John Erskine D, WSH 2012-13 David Schlemko D, MTL
30 Games played 30
3 Goals 1
3 Assists 5
6 Points 6
0.20 Points per game 0.20
10 Plus/minus 8
32 Shots 35
9.4 Shooting % 2.9
91 Hits 38
34 Penalty minutes 12
18:28 Average ice time 17:13
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.4 Corsi for % 49.0
-2.4 CF% relative to team -2.9
47.9 Fenwick for % 50.1
45.6 Expected goals for % 45.7
-5.6 xGF% relative to team -5.0
61.1 Goals for % 65.5
104.6 PDO 104.1
67 Shot attempts taken 61
Expected goals, all situations
1.0 Expected goals 2.1
0.11 Expected goals per 60 0.24
2.4% Chance per attempt 3.6%
+2.0 Goals above expected -1.1
Rating, in goals
-0.9 Goals above replacement -1.8
-0.2 Wins above replacement -0.3
-0.8 Even-strength offence -0.3
-1.2 Even-strength defence -2.3
-0.1 Power play -0.7
-0.3 Penalty kill +0.1
-0.4 Penalties -0.4
Contract
$1.5M Cap hit $550K
$250K Cap dollars per point $92K
-$288K Worth at the going rate -$1M
-$1.8M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean