Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Kent Huskins Mike Green

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKent Huskins: Goals, 0.08 a game, 70th percentileKent Huskins: Assists, 0.20 a game, 49th percentileKent Huskins: Points, 0.28 a game, 56th percentileKent Huskins: Shots, 0.64 a game, 13th percentileKent Huskins: Hits, 0.24 a game, 1st percentileKent Huskins: Corsi for %, 51.4%, 69th percentileKent Huskins: CF% rel, 0.4, 58th percentileKent Huskins: On-ice xG %, 54.1%, 86th percentileKent Huskins: Rating, +1.1 goals above replacement, 45th percentileKent Huskins: Chances created, 0.10 xG per 60, 13th percentileKent Huskins: Shot quality, 2.6% a shot, 19th percentileKent Huskins: Finishing, +1.3 goals above expected, 79th percentileMike Green: Goals, 0.09 a game, 78th percentileMike Green: Assists, 0.13 a game, 22nd percentileMike Green: Points, 0.22 a game, 40th percentileMike Green: Shots, 2.00 a game, 85th percentileMike Green: Hits, 0.84 a game, 30th percentileMike Green: Corsi for %, 52.3%, 76th percentileMike Green: CF% rel, 3.0, 82nd percentileMike Green: On-ice xG %, 52.5%, 76th percentileMike Green: Rating, +2.1 goals above replacement, 55th percentileMike Green: Chances created, 0.30 xG per 60, 92nd percentileMike Green: Shot quality, 3.5% a shot, 67th percentileMike Green: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 53rd percentile
024620Kent Huskins 7Mike Green 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kent Huskins
Mike Green

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kent Huskins D, PHI 2011-12 Mike Green D, EDM
25 Games played 32
2 Goals 3
5 Assists 4
7 Points 7
0.28 Points per game 0.22
9 Plus/minus 5
16 Shots 64
12.5 Shooting % 4.7
6 Hits 27
10 Penalty minutes 12
15:28 Average ice time 21:03
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.4 Corsi for % 52.3
+0.4 CF% relative to team +3.0
52.3 Fenwick for % 51.8
54.1 Expected goals for % 52.5
+0.8 xGF% relative to team +2.2
65.2 Goals for % 58.1
104.2 PDO 102.7
36 Shot attempts taken 109
Expected goals, all situations
0.7 Expected goals 3.4
0.10 Expected goals per 60 0.30
2.6% Chance per attempt 3.5%
+1.3 Goals above expected -0.4
Rating, in goals
+1.1 Goals above replacement +2.1
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.4
+0.1 Even-strength offence -0.1
-0.5 Even-strength defence +0.2
-0.1 Power play -0.2
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.1 Penalties -0.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean