Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Kent Huskins Jonathon Blum

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kent Huskins D, PHI		2011-12	Jonathon Blum D, MIN
	25	Games played	33
	2	Goals	3
	5	Assists	4
	7	Points	7
	0.28	Points per game	0.21
	9	Plus/minus	-14
	16	Shots	25
	12.5	Shooting %	12.0
	6	Hits	17
	10	Penalty minutes	6
	15:28	Average ice time	17:56
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
	51.4	Corsi for %	43.4
	+0.4	CF% relative to team	-3.8
	52.3	Fenwick for %	42.7
	54.1	Expected goals for %	43.3
	+0.8	xGF% relative to team	-5.9
	65.2	Goals for %	35.7
	104.2	PDO	97.6
	36	Shot attempts taken	41
Expected goals, all situations
	0.7	Expected goals	1.4
	0.10	Expected goals per 60	0.14
	2.6%	Chance per attempt	3.8%
	+1.3	Goals above expected	+1.6
Rating, in goals
	+1.1	Goals above replacement	-0.2
	+0.2	Wins above replacement	0.0
	+0.1	Even-strength offence	-1.0
	-0.5	Even-strength defence	-0.3
	-0.1	Power play	-0.6
	+0.3	Penalty kill	-0.3
	+0.1	Penalties	+0.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean