Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Chris Neil Brandon Tanev

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Neil: Goals, 0.02 a game, 2nd percentileChris Neil: Assists, 0.06 a game, 7th percentileChris Neil: Points, 0.08 a game, 2nd percentileChris Neil: Shots, 0.79 a game, 5th percentileChris Neil: Hits, 2.04 a game, 87th percentileChris Neil: Corsi for %, 45.8%, 12th percentileChris Neil: CF% rel, -2.8, 20th percentileChris Neil: On-ice xG %, 45.3%, 15th percentileChris Neil: Rating, -1.0 goals above replacement, 14th percentileChris Neil: Chances created, 0.53 xG per 60, 15th percentileChris Neil: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 28th percentileChris Neil: Finishing, -2.5 goals above expected, 25th percentileBrandon Tanev: Goals, 0.04 a game, 6th percentileBrandon Tanev: Assists, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileBrandon Tanev: Points, 0.08 a game, 3rd percentileBrandon Tanev: Shots, 1.06 a game, 17th percentileBrandon Tanev: Hits, 2.51 a game, 94th percentileBrandon Tanev: Corsi for %, 43.1%, 3rd percentileBrandon Tanev: CF% rel, -6.9, 4th percentileBrandon Tanev: On-ice xG %, 44.0%, 10th percentileBrandon Tanev: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileBrandon Tanev: Chances created, 0.47 xG per 60, 7th percentileBrandon Tanev: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 10th percentileBrandon Tanev: Finishing, -2.2 goals above expected, 30th percentile
012342040Chris Neil 4Brandon Tanev 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Neil
Brandon Tanev

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Neil R, OTT 2016-17 Brandon Tanev L, UTA
53 Games played 51
1 Goals 2
3 Assists 2
4 Points 4
0.08 Points per game 0.08
-11 Plus/minus -6
42 Shots 54
2.4 Shooting % 3.7
108 Hits 128
63 Penalty minutes 26
7:34 Average ice time 10:41
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.8 Corsi for % 43.1
-2.8 CF% relative to team -6.9
46.0 Fenwick for % 42.8
45.3 Expected goals for % 44.0
-3.7 xGF% relative to team -6.6
23.8 Goals for % 35.0
94.2 PDO 98.3
64 Shot attempts taken 79
Expected goals, all situations
3.5 Expected goals 4.2
0.53 Expected goals per 60 0.47
7.0% Chance per attempt 6.2%
-2.5 Goals above expected -2.2
Rating, in goals
-1.0 Goals above replacement +1.0
-0.2 Wins above replacement +0.2
-2.5 Even-strength offence -3.4
+1.2 Even-strength defence +1.7
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.2
-0.8 Penalties +1.5
Contract
$1.5M Cap hit $874K
$375K Cap dollars per point $219K
-$72K Worth at the going rate $1.2M
-$1.6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$367K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean