Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Mark Eaton Jim Vandermeer

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMark Eaton: Goals, 0.02 a game, 15th percentileMark Eaton: Assists, 0.05 a game, 3rd percentileMark Eaton: Points, 0.06 a game, 3rd percentileMark Eaton: Shots, 0.71 a game, 16th percentileMark Eaton: Hits, 0.85 a game, 31st percentileMark Eaton: Corsi for %, 43.2%, 2nd percentileMark Eaton: CF% rel, -6.4, 3rd percentileMark Eaton: On-ice xG %, 46.7%, 26th percentileMark Eaton: Rating, -1.5 goals above replacement, 15th percentileMark Eaton: Chances created, 0.12 xG per 60, 24th percentileMark Eaton: Shot quality, 3.4% a shot, 63rd percentileMark Eaton: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 33rd percentileJim Vandermeer: Goals, 0.04 a game, 40th percentileJim Vandermeer: Assists, 0.12 a game, 20th percentileJim Vandermeer: Points, 0.16 a game, 23rd percentileJim Vandermeer: Shots, 0.76 a game, 20th percentileJim Vandermeer: Hits, 0.56 a game, 8th percentileJim Vandermeer: Corsi for %, 51.8%, 71st percentileJim Vandermeer: CF% rel, -2.3, 29th percentileJim Vandermeer: On-ice xG %, 50.8%, 65th percentileJim Vandermeer: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileJim Vandermeer: Chances created, 0.23 xG per 60, 70th percentileJim Vandermeer: Shot quality, 3.9% a shot, 86th percentileJim Vandermeer: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 62nd percentile
01234204060Mark Eaton 4Jim Vandermeer 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Mark Eaton
Jim Vandermeer

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Mark Eaton D, PIT 2011-12 Jim Vandermeer D, SJS
62 Games played 25
1 Goals 1
3 Assists 3
4 Points 4
0.06 Points per game 0.16
-17 Plus/minus 3
44 Shots 19
2.3 Shooting % 5.3
53 Hits 14
10 Penalty minutes 33
16:03 Average ice time 10:25
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.2 Corsi for % 51.8
-6.4 CF% relative to team -2.3
44.8 Fenwick for % 52.6
46.7 Expected goals for % 50.8
-3.4 xGF% relative to team -4.7
34.9 Goals for % 71.4
96.9 PDO 102.1
78 Shot attempts taken 40
Expected goals, all situations
2.0 Expected goals 1.0
0.12 Expected goals per 60 0.23
3.4% Chance per attempt 3.9%
-1.0 Goals above expected 0.0
Rating, in goals
-1.5 Goals above replacement +0.1
-0.2 Wins above replacement +0.0
-2.9 Even-strength offence -0.6
-1.0 Even-strength defence +0.4
0.0 Power play +0.0
-0.4 Penalty kill -0.1
-0.5 Penalties -0.5

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean