Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Doug Janik Alexander Urbom

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDoug Janik: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileDoug Janik: Assists, 0.11 a game, 18th percentileDoug Janik: Points, 0.11 a game, 13th percentileDoug Janik: Shots, 0.67 a game, 14th percentileDoug Janik: Hits, 0.78 a game, 25th percentileDoug Janik: Corsi for %, 56.0%, 97th percentileDoug Janik: CF% rel, 2.0, 74th percentileDoug Janik: On-ice xG %, 59.0%, 99th percentileDoug Janik: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 39th percentileDoug Janik: Chances created, 0.16 xG per 60, 43rd percentileDoug Janik: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 9th percentileDoug Janik: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 55th percentileAlexander Urbom: Goals, 0.20 a game, 99th percentileAlexander Urbom: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAlexander Urbom: Points, 0.20 a game, 35th percentileAlexander Urbom: Shots, 0.60 a game, 7th percentileAlexander Urbom: Hits, 1.00 a game, 40th percentileAlexander Urbom: Corsi for %, 44.6%, 7th percentileAlexander Urbom: CF% rel, -2.6, 27th percentileAlexander Urbom: On-ice xG %, 43.0%, 3rd percentileAlexander Urbom: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileAlexander Urbom: Chances created, 0.22 xG per 60, 65th percentileAlexander Urbom: Shot quality, 5.1% a shot, 99th percentileAlexander Urbom: Finishing, +0.7 goals above expected, 71st percentile
00.20.40.60.81Doug Janik 1Alexander Urbom 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Doug Janik
Alexander Urbom

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Doug Janik D, DET 2011-12 Alexander Urbom D, WSH
9 Games played 5
0 Goals 1
1 Assists 0
1 Points 1
0.11 Points per game 0.20
2 Plus/minus 1
6 Shots 3
0.0 Shooting % 33.3
7 Hits 5
6 Penalty minutes 9
14:30 Average ice time 13:36
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
56.0 Corsi for % 44.6
+2.0 CF% relative to team -2.6
57.3 Fenwick for % 45.5
59.0 Expected goals for % 43.0
+11.0 xGF% relative to team -5.1
58.3 Goals for % 50.0
100.5 PDO 102.4
25 Shot attempts taken 4
Expected goals, all situations
0.3 Expected goals 0.3
0.16 Expected goals per 60 0.22
2.3% Chance per attempt 5.1%
-0.3 Goals above expected +0.7
Rating, in goals
+0.6 Goals above replacement -0.8
+0.1 Wins above replacement -0.1
+0.4 Even-strength offence -0.3
+0.1 Even-strength defence -0.5
0.0 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.3 Penalties -0.3

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean