Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Craig Anderson Mike Condon

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCraig Anderson: Save %, 0.926, 91st percentileCraig Anderson: Goals against, 2.30 a game, 64th percentileCraig Anderson: Workload, 31.2 shots a game, 89th percentileCraig Anderson: Games, 40 games, 42nd percentileCraig Anderson: Goals saved, +0.25 above expected per 60, 78th percentileMike Condon: Save %, 0.914, 45th percentileMike Condon: Goals against, 2.34 a game, 60th percentileMike Condon: Workload, 27.4 shots a game, 38th percentileMike Condon: Games, 41 games, 45th percentileMike Condon: Goals saved, +0.02 above expected per 60, 51st percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Craig Anderson G, BUF 2016-17 Mike Condon G, OTT
40 Games played 41
25 Wins 19
11 Losses 14
5 Shutouts 5
1,247 Shots against 1,122
1,155 Saves 1,026
92 Goals against 96
0.926 Save % 0.914
2.28 Goals against average 2.48
Expected goals, while he was in net
102.1 Expected goals against 96.7
+10.1 Goals saved above expected +0.7
+0.25 Saved above expected per 60 +0.02
5.9% Chance per attempt faced 5.9%
Rating, in goals
+20.5 Goals above replacement +10.6
+3.4 Wins above replacement +1.8
Contract
$4.2M Cap hit $575K
$5M Worth at the going rate $2.9M
+$814K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean