Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Chris Kelly Riley Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Kelly: Goals, 0.09 a game, 28th percentileChris Kelly: Assists, 0.18 a game, 40th percentileChris Kelly: Points, 0.26 a game, 31st percentileChris Kelly: Shots, 1.18 a game, 26th percentileChris Kelly: Hits, 1.26 a game, 57th percentileChris Kelly: Corsi for %, 50.4%, 56th percentileChris Kelly: CF% rel, -5.0, 13th percentileChris Kelly: On-ice xG %, 51.3%, 64th percentileChris Kelly: Rating, +2.3 goals above replacement, 55th percentileChris Kelly: Chances created, 0.58 xG per 60, 29th percentileChris Kelly: Shot quality, 9.2% a shot, 94th percentileChris Kelly: Finishing, -2.0 goals above expected, 24th percentileRiley Nash: Goals, 0.13 a game, 37th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.16 a game, 35th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.28 a game, 34th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.13 a game, 22nd percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.13 a game, 50th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 51.7%, 68th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, 0.7, 58th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 47.7%, 33rd percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 63rd percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 33rd percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 65th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 52nd percentile
0246820Chris Kelly 9Riley Nash 9

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Kelly
Riley Nash

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Kelly C, ANA 2012-13 Riley Nash C, NYR
34 Games played 32
3 Goals 4
6 Assists 5
9 Points 9
0.26 Points per game 0.28
-8 Plus/minus -4
40 Shots 36
7.5 Shooting % 11.1
43 Hits 36
16 Penalty minutes 8
14:58 Average ice time 12:48
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.4 Corsi for % 51.7
-5.0 CF% relative to team +0.7
50.5 Fenwick for % 50.3
51.3 Expected goals for % 47.7
-1.5 xGF% relative to team +0.1
37.0 Goals for % 42.9
95.6 PDO 98.0
54 Shot attempts taken 59
Expected goals, all situations
5.0 Expected goals 4.1
0.58 Expected goals per 60 0.60
9.2% Chance per attempt 7.9%
-2.0 Goals above expected -0.1
Rating, in goals
+2.3 Goals above replacement +2.6
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.4
-1.5 Even-strength offence -0.1
+1.4 Even-strength defence +1.7
+0.2 Power play -0.3
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.4 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$3M Cap hit $704K
$333K Cap dollars per point $78K
$2.5M Worth at the going rate $2.8M
-$501K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean