Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Dan Ellis Justin Peters

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerDan Ellis: Save %, 0.906, 33rd percentileDan Ellis: Goals against, 2.74 a game, 11th percentileDan Ellis: Workload, 29.2 shots a game, 84th percentileDan Ellis: Games, 19 games, 28th percentileDan Ellis: Goals saved, +0.02 above expected per 60, 50th percentileJustin Peters: Save %, 0.891, 9th percentileJustin Peters: Goals against, 2.89 a game, 4th percentileJustin Peters: Workload, 26.6 shots a game, 39th percentileJustin Peters: Games, 19 games, 28th percentileJustin Peters: Goals saved, -0.26 above expected per 60, 24th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 57 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Dan Ellis G, FLA 2012-13 Justin Peters G, ARI
19 Games played 19
6 Wins 4
8 Losses 11
1 Shutouts 1
555 Shots against 506
503 Saves 451
52 Goals against 55
0.906 Save % 0.891
3.13 Goals against average 3.46
Expected goals, while he was in net
52.3 Expected goals against 50.9
+0.3 Goals saved above expected -4.1
+0.02 Saved above expected per 60 -0.26
6.9% Chance per attempt faced 7.1%
Rating, in goals
+5.7 Goals above replacement +1.1
+0.9 Wins above replacement +0.2
Contract
$800K Cap hit $538K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean