Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Dan Ellis Justin Peters

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerDan Ellis: Save %, 0.879, 1st percentileDan Ellis: Goals against, 3.10 a game, 2nd percentileDan Ellis: Workload, 25.7 shots a game, 22nd percentileDan Ellis: Games, 20 games, 6th percentileDan Ellis: Goals saved, -0.64 above expected per 60, 1st percentileJustin Peters: Save %, 0.919, 63rd percentileJustin Peters: Goals against, 2.43 a game, 45th percentileJustin Peters: Workload, 29.8 shots a game, 82nd percentileJustin Peters: Games, 21 games, 9th percentileJustin Peters: Goals saved, +0.27 above expected per 60, 79th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 65 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Dan Ellis G, FLA 2013-14 Justin Peters G, ARI
20 Games played 21
5 Wins 7
11 Losses 9
1 Shutouts 1
514 Shots against 626
452 Saves 575
62 Goals against 51
0.879 Save % 0.919
3.62 Goals against average 2.50
Expected goals, while he was in net
51.0 Expected goals against 56.4
-11.0 Goals saved above expected +5.4
-0.64 Saved above expected per 60 +0.27
6.9% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
-5.8 Goals above replacement +11.2
-1.0 Wins above replacement +1.9
Contract
$900K Cap hit $538K
-$623K Worth at the going rate $2.8M
-$1.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean