Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Dan Ellis Cam Talbot

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerDan Ellis: Save %, 0.879, 1st percentileDan Ellis: Goals against, 3.10 a game, 2nd percentileDan Ellis: Workload, 25.7 shots a game, 22nd percentileDan Ellis: Games, 20 games, 6th percentileDan Ellis: Goals saved, -0.64 above expected per 60, 1st percentileCam Talbot: Save %, 0.941, 98th percentileCam Talbot: Goals against, 1.57 a game, 98th percentileCam Talbot: Workload, 26.7 shots a game, 37th percentileCam Talbot: Games, 21 games, 9th percentileCam Talbot: Goals saved, +0.77 above expected per 60, 98th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 65 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Dan Ellis G, FLA 2013-14 Cam Talbot G, CBJ
20 Games played 21
5 Wins 12
11 Losses 6
1 Shutouts 3
514 Shots against 560
452 Saves 527
62 Goals against 33
0.879 Save % 0.941
3.62 Goals against average 1.64
Expected goals, while he was in net
51.0 Expected goals against 48.6
-11.0 Goals saved above expected +15.6
-0.64 Saved above expected per 60 +0.77
6.9% Chance per attempt faced 6.2%
Rating, in goals
-5.8 Goals above replacement +20.6
-1.0 Wins above replacement +3.4
Contract
$900K Cap hit $563K
-$623K Worth at the going rate $4.7M
-$1.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$4.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean