Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

John-Michael Liles Marc Staal

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJohn-Michael Liles: Goals, 0.06 a game, 52nd percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Assists, 0.28 a game, 74th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Points, 0.34 a game, 69th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Shots, 1.47 a game, 67th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Hits, 1.41 a game, 56th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Corsi for %, 45.0%, 9th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: CF% rel, 0.9, 63rd percentileJohn-Michael Liles: On-ice xG %, 44.3%, 10th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Rating, +2.2 goals above replacement, 60th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Chances created, 0.22 xG per 60, 70th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 75th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Finishing, -1.2 goals above expected, 15th percentileMarc Staal: Goals, 0.10 a game, 73rd percentileMarc Staal: Assists, 0.43 a game, 92nd percentileMarc Staal: Points, 0.52 a game, 90th percentileMarc Staal: Shots, 0.95 a game, 36th percentileMarc Staal: Hits, 2.24 a game, 84th percentileMarc Staal: Corsi for %, 51.2%, 65th percentileMarc Staal: CF% rel, -1.9, 31st percentileMarc Staal: On-ice xG %, 54.1%, 78th percentileMarc Staal: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 39th percentileMarc Staal: Chances created, 0.25 xG per 60, 80th percentileMarc Staal: Shot quality, 5.4% a shot, 99th percentileMarc Staal: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 46th percentile
051020John-Michael Liles 11Marc Staal 11

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

John-Michael Liles
Marc Staal

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

John-Michael Liles D, BOS 2012-13 Marc Staal D, PHI
32 Games played 21
2 Goals 2
9 Assists 9
11 Points 11
0.34 Points per game 0.52
-1 Plus/minus 4
47 Shots 20
4.3 Shooting % 10.0
45 Hits 47
4 Penalty minutes 14
18:46 Average ice time 24:27
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.0 Corsi for % 51.2
+0.9 CF% relative to team -1.9
43.6 Fenwick for % 51.5
44.3 Expected goals for % 54.1
+0.5 xGF% relative to team +1.0
45.7 Goals for % 59.4
100.6 PDO 102.7
63 Shot attempts taken 54
Expected goals, all situations
2.2 Expected goals 2.2
0.22 Expected goals per 60 0.25
3.6% Chance per attempt 5.4%
-1.2 Goals above expected -0.2
Rating, in goals
+2.2 Goals above replacement +0.6
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.1
-0.1 Even-strength offence +0.7
-0.2 Even-strength defence -1.1
-0.7 Power play +0.3
+0.2 Penalty kill -0.3
+1.1 Penalties -0.7
Contract
$3.875M Cap hit $3.975M
$352K Cap dollars per point $361K
$2.5M Worth at the going rate $1M
-$1.4M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean