Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

John-Michael Liles Cody Ceci

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJohn-Michael Liles: Goals, 0.05 a game, 42nd percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Assists, 0.17 a game, 42nd percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Points, 0.22 a game, 42nd percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Shots, 1.37 a game, 54th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Hits, 1.22 a game, 46th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Corsi for %, 49.4%, 40th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: CF% rel, 1.0, 65th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: On-ice xG %, 53.7%, 82nd percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Rating, +4.6 goals above replacement, 71st percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Chances created, 0.19 xG per 60, 52nd percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Shot quality, 3.3% a shot, 56th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Finishing, -0.6 goals above expected, 40th percentileCody Ceci: Goals, 0.06 a game, 55th percentileCody Ceci: Assists, 0.12 a game, 20th percentileCody Ceci: Points, 0.18 a game, 26th percentileCody Ceci: Shots, 1.67 a game, 76th percentileCody Ceci: Hits, 0.92 a game, 31st percentileCody Ceci: Corsi for %, 51.1%, 62nd percentileCody Ceci: CF% rel, -2.8, 22nd percentileCody Ceci: On-ice xG %, 50.4%, 56th percentileCody Ceci: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 36th percentileCody Ceci: Chances created, 0.21 xG per 60, 60th percentileCody Ceci: Shot quality, 2.7% a shot, 25th percentileCody Ceci: Finishing, +0.0 goals above expected, 52nd percentile
024682040John-Michael Liles 9Cody Ceci 9

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

John-Michael Liles
Cody Ceci

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

John-Michael Liles D, BOS 2013-14 Cody Ceci D, LAK
41 Games played 49
2 Goals 3
7 Assists 6
9 Points 9
0.22 Points per game 0.18
5 Plus/minus -5
56 Shots 82
3.6 Shooting % 3.7
50 Hits 45
8 Penalty minutes 14
19:39 Average ice time 17:12
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.4 Corsi for % 51.1
+1.0 CF% relative to team -2.8
50.6 Fenwick for % 51.0
53.7 Expected goals for % 50.4
+6.4 xGF% relative to team -1.2
56.5 Goals for % 45.8
101.2 PDO 98.6
81 Shot attempts taken 131
Expected goals, all situations
2.6 Expected goals 3.0
0.19 Expected goals per 60 0.21
3.3% Chance per attempt 2.7%
-0.6 Goals above expected +0.0
Rating, in goals
+4.6 Goals above replacement +0.6
+0.8 Wins above replacement +0.1
-1.0 Even-strength offence -0.3
+3.6 Even-strength defence -0.7
-0.6 Power play -1.0
-0.2 Penalty kill +0.3
+0.1 Penalties -0.5
Contract
$3.875M Cap hit $894K
$431K Cap dollars per point $99K
$3.1M Worth at the going rate $861K
-$727K Value: worth minus cap hit -$33K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean