Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

John-Michael Liles Gustav Forsling

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJohn-Michael Liles: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Assists, 0.14 a game, 28th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Points, 0.14 a game, 15th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Shots, 1.00 a game, 25th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Hits, 0.69 a game, 19th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Corsi for %, 53.3%, 86th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: CF% rel, 0.2, 54th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: On-ice xG %, 54.3%, 87th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 59th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 47th percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 51st percentileJohn-Michael Liles: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 21st percentileGustav Forsling: Goals, 0.05 a game, 50th percentileGustav Forsling: Assists, 0.08 a game, 6th percentileGustav Forsling: Points, 0.13 a game, 12th percentileGustav Forsling: Shots, 1.26 a game, 51st percentileGustav Forsling: Hits, 0.42 a game, 7th percentileGustav Forsling: Corsi for %, 48.8%, 39th percentileGustav Forsling: CF% rel, -2.4, 22nd percentileGustav Forsling: On-ice xG %, 42.8%, 5th percentileGustav Forsling: Rating, -3.1 goals above replacement, 4th percentileGustav Forsling: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 53rd percentileGustav Forsling: Shot quality, 2.8% a shot, 33rd percentileGustav Forsling: Finishing, +0.2 goals above expected, 59th percentile
01234520John-Michael Liles 5Gustav Forsling 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

John-Michael Liles
Gustav Forsling

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

John-Michael Liles D, BOS 2016-17 Gustav Forsling D, FLA
36 Games played 38
0 Goals 2
5 Assists 3
5 Points 5
0.14 Points per game 0.13
1 Plus/minus 3
36 Shots 48
0.0 Shooting % 4.2
25 Hits 16
4 Penalty minutes 4
16:12 Average ice time 14:49
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.3 Corsi for % 48.8
+0.2 CF% relative to team -2.4
55.5 Fenwick for % 46.7
54.3 Expected goals for % 42.8
-0.9 xGF% relative to team -8.4
52.2 Goals for % 56.7
99.5 PDO 102.3
64 Shot attempts taken 106
Expected goals, all situations
1.7 Expected goals 1.8
0.18 Expected goals per 60 0.20
3.1% Chance per attempt 2.8%
-1.7 Goals above expected +0.2
Rating, in goals
+2.6 Goals above replacement -3.1
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.5
-1.8 Even-strength offence -1.0
+1.4 Even-strength defence -3.5
0.0 Power play -0.5
+0.2 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.9 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$2M Cap hit $873K
$400K Cap dollars per point $175K
$2.2M Worth at the going rate -$1.4M
+$239K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean