Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Deryk Engelland Marc Methot

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDeryk Engelland: Goals, 0.04 a game, 41st percentileDeryk Engelland: Assists, 0.13 a game, 28th percentileDeryk Engelland: Points, 0.17 a game, 31st percentileDeryk Engelland: Shots, 1.03 a game, 35th percentileDeryk Engelland: Hits, 1.52 a game, 63rd percentileDeryk Engelland: Corsi for %, 45.3%, 9th percentileDeryk Engelland: CF% rel, -3.7, 15th percentileDeryk Engelland: On-ice xG %, 45.9%, 16th percentileDeryk Engelland: Rating, -0.1 goals above replacement, 29th percentileDeryk Engelland: Chances created, 0.13 xG per 60, 28th percentileDeryk Engelland: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 11th percentileDeryk Engelland: Finishing, +0.7 goals above expected, 67th percentileMarc Methot: Goals, 0.07 a game, 64th percentileMarc Methot: Assists, 0.10 a game, 17th percentileMarc Methot: Points, 0.17 a game, 31st percentileMarc Methot: Shots, 1.07 a game, 38th percentileMarc Methot: Hits, 1.80 a game, 74th percentileMarc Methot: Corsi for %, 46.7%, 16th percentileMarc Methot: CF% rel, -0.6, 46th percentileMarc Methot: On-ice xG %, 45.0%, 10th percentileMarc Methot: Rating, -1.3 goals above replacement, 17th percentileMarc Methot: Chances created, 0.10 xG per 60, 11th percentileMarc Methot: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 14th percentileMarc Methot: Finishing, +2.7 goals above expected, 87th percentile
0510204060Deryk Engelland 12Marc Methot 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Deryk Engelland
Marc Methot

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Deryk Engelland D, VGK 2015-16 Marc Methot D, DAL
69 Games played 69
3 Goals 5
9 Assists 7
12 Points 12
0.17 Points per game 0.17
7 Plus/minus 12
71 Shots 74
4.2 Shooting % 6.8
105 Hits 124
54 Penalty minutes 34
15:14 Average ice time 20:39
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.3 Corsi for % 46.7
-3.7 CF% relative to team -0.6
46.7 Fenwick for % 45.3
45.9 Expected goals for % 45.0
-2.7 xGF% relative to team -2.0
50.0 Goals for % 51.0
100.7 PDO 101.9
143 Shot attempts taken 122
Expected goals, all situations
2.3 Expected goals 2.3
0.13 Expected goals per 60 0.10
2.4% Chance per attempt 2.4%
+0.7 Goals above expected +2.7
Rating, in goals
-0.1 Goals above replacement -1.3
0.0 Wins above replacement -0.2
-1.3 Even-strength offence -3.2
-1.2 Even-strength defence -0.9
-0.1 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill -0.1
-0.9 Penalties -1.9
Contract
$2.917M Cap hit $4.9M
$243K Cap dollars per point $408K
$502K Worth at the going rate -$276K
-$2.4M Value: worth minus cap hit -$5.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean