Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Stephen Weiss Riley Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerStephen Weiss: Goals, 0.17 a game, 52nd percentileStephen Weiss: Assists, 0.31 a game, 65th percentileStephen Weiss: Points, 0.48 a game, 60th percentileStephen Weiss: Shots, 1.00 a game, 13th percentileStephen Weiss: Hits, 0.37 a game, 7th percentileStephen Weiss: Corsi for %, 52.7%, 69th percentileStephen Weiss: CF% rel, -1.4, 31st percentileStephen Weiss: On-ice xG %, 52.8%, 67th percentileStephen Weiss: Rating, +1.4 goals above replacement, 35th percentileStephen Weiss: Chances created, 0.75 xG per 60, 56th percentileStephen Weiss: Shot quality, 10.5% a shot, 98th percentileStephen Weiss: Finishing, +1.6 goals above expected, 70th percentileRiley Nash: Goals, 0.12 a game, 30th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.25 a game, 54th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.37 a game, 42nd percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.38 a game, 35th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.29 a game, 53rd percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.9%, 71st percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, 1.1, 58th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 53.2%, 69th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +7.7 goals above replacement, 81st percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 51st percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 10.7% a shot, 99th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -5.3 goals above expected, 6th percentile
0510152025204060Stephen Weiss 25Riley Nash 25

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Stephen Weiss
Riley Nash

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Stephen Weiss C, DET 2014-15 Riley Nash C, NYR
52 Games played 68
9 Goals 8
16 Assists 17
25 Points 25
0.48 Points per game 0.37
-2 Plus/minus -10
52 Shots 94
17.3 Shooting % 8.5
19 Hits 88
16 Penalty minutes 12
11:21 Average ice time 16:19
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.7 Corsi for % 52.9
-1.4 CF% relative to team +1.1
51.2 Fenwick for % 52.0
52.8 Expected goals for % 53.2
-0.1 xGF% relative to team +2.7
55.9 Goals for % 44.8
101.8 PDO 97.7
68 Shot attempts taken 126
Expected goals, all situations
7.4 Expected goals 13.3
0.75 Expected goals per 60 0.72
10.5% Chance per attempt 10.7%
+1.6 Goals above expected -5.3
Rating, in goals
+1.4 Goals above replacement +7.7
+0.2 Wins above replacement +1.3
+1.0 Even-strength offence -0.1
-0.6 Even-strength defence +3.6
+0.1 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill +0.7
-0.8 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$4.9M Cap hit $575K
$196K Cap dollars per point $23K
$1.4M Worth at the going rate $5.2M
-$3.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$4.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean