Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Dan Hamhuis Brent Burns

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDan Hamhuis: Goals, 0.05 a game, 49th percentileDan Hamhuis: Assists, 0.40 a game, 89th percentileDan Hamhuis: Points, 0.45 a game, 85th percentileDan Hamhuis: Shots, 1.71 a game, 78th percentileDan Hamhuis: Hits, 1.26 a game, 50th percentileDan Hamhuis: Corsi for %, 55.1%, 94th percentileDan Hamhuis: CF% rel, 3.7, 90th percentileDan Hamhuis: On-ice xG %, 52.0%, 72nd percentileDan Hamhuis: Rating, +10.3 goals above replacement, 96th percentileDan Hamhuis: Chances created, 0.23 xG per 60, 67th percentileDan Hamhuis: Shot quality, 3.5% a shot, 68th percentileDan Hamhuis: Finishing, -3.3 goals above expected, 3rd percentileBrent Burns: Goals, 0.14 a game, 93rd percentileBrent Burns: Assists, 0.32 a game, 83rd percentileBrent Burns: Points, 0.46 a game, 86th percentileBrent Burns: Shots, 2.48 a game, 95th percentileBrent Burns: Hits, 0.84 a game, 29th percentileBrent Burns: Corsi for %, 53.3%, 84th percentileBrent Burns: CF% rel, 2.4, 77th percentileBrent Burns: On-ice xG %, 57.5%, 98th percentileBrent Burns: Rating, +11.2 goals above replacement, 97th percentileBrent Burns: Chances created, 0.37 xG per 60, 99th percentileBrent Burns: Shot quality, 3.8% a shot, 81st percentileBrent Burns: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 56th percentile
010203020406080Dan Hamhuis 37Brent Burns 37

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Dan Hamhuis
Brent Burns

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Dan Hamhuis D, NSH 2011-12 Brent Burns D, COL
82 Games played 81
4 Goals 11
33 Assists 26
37 Points 37
0.45 Points per game 0.46
29 Plus/minus 8
140 Shots 201
2.9 Shooting % 5.5
103 Hits 68
46 Penalty minutes 34
23:26 Average ice time 22:32
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
55.1 Corsi for % 53.3
+3.7 CF% relative to team +2.4
53.2 Fenwick for % 54.5
52.0 Expected goals for % 57.5
+5.3 xGF% relative to team +4.4
62.1 Goals for % 54.3
103.4 PDO 99.9
238 Shot attempts taken 325
Expected goals, all situations
7.3 Expected goals 11.3
0.23 Expected goals per 60 0.37
3.5% Chance per attempt 3.8%
-3.3 Goals above expected -0.3
Rating, in goals
+10.3 Goals above replacement +11.2
+1.7 Wins above replacement +1.9
+1.3 Even-strength offence +4.8
+3.3 Even-strength defence -0.7
-0.3 Power play +1.0
-0.4 Penalty kill -0.4
0.0 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$4.5M Cap hit $3.55M
$122K Cap dollars per point $96K
$5.2M Worth at the going rate $5.6M
+$655K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean