Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Ales Hemsky Joel Eriksson Ek

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAles Hemsky: Goals, 0.27 a game, 78th percentileAles Hemsky: Assists, 0.20 a game, 45th percentileAles Hemsky: Points, 0.47 a game, 61st percentileAles Hemsky: Shots, 2.00 a game, 67th percentileAles Hemsky: Hits, 0.07 a game, 1st percentileAles Hemsky: Corsi for %, 51.4%, 65th percentileAles Hemsky: CF% rel, 1.8, 66th percentileAles Hemsky: On-ice xG %, 50.6%, 55th percentileAles Hemsky: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 36th percentileAles Hemsky: Chances created, 0.88 xG per 60, 77th percentileAles Hemsky: Shot quality, 7.8% a shot, 54th percentileAles Hemsky: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 61st percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Goals, 0.20 a game, 61st percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Assists, 0.27 a game, 63rd percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Points, 0.47 a game, 61st percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Shots, 1.00 a game, 14th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Hits, 1.53 a game, 74th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Corsi for %, 41.7%, 2nd percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: CF% rel, -11.5, 1st percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: On-ice xG %, 42.5%, 5th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Rating, +0.0 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 9th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Shot quality, 5.8% a shot, 5th percentileJoel Eriksson Ek: Finishing, +1.7 goals above expected, 69th percentile
0246Ales Hemsky 7Joel Eriksson Ek 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Ales Hemsky
Joel Eriksson Ek

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Ales Hemsky R, MTL 2016-17 Joel Eriksson Ek C, MIN
15 Games played 15
4 Goals 3
3 Assists 4
7 Points 7
0.47 Points per game 0.47
-1 Plus/minus 1
30 Shots 15
13.3 Shooting % 20.0
1 Hits 23
0 Penalty minutes 4
14:25 Average ice time 10:37
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.4 Corsi for % 41.7
+1.8 CF% relative to team -11.5
49.8 Fenwick for % 42.3
50.6 Expected goals for % 42.5
+2.1 xGF% relative to team -16.2
50.0 Goals for % 53.8
99.7 PDO 104.8
41 Shot attempts taken 25
Expected goals, all situations
3.2 Expected goals 1.3
0.88 Expected goals per 60 0.48
7.8% Chance per attempt 5.8%
+0.8 Goals above expected +1.7
Rating, in goals
+1.5 Goals above replacement +0.0
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.0
+0.4 Even-strength offence -0.1
+0.1 Even-strength defence -0.2
+0.3 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.2 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$4M Cap hit $894K
$571K Cap dollars per point $128K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean