Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

David Steckel Colin Fraser

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDavid Steckel: Goals, 0.03 a game, 6th percentileDavid Steckel: Assists, 0.18 a game, 40th percentileDavid Steckel: Points, 0.21 a game, 21st percentileDavid Steckel: Shots, 0.68 a game, 7th percentileDavid Steckel: Hits, 1.21 a game, 54th percentileDavid Steckel: Corsi for %, 45.2%, 14th percentileDavid Steckel: CF% rel, -4.0, 18th percentileDavid Steckel: On-ice xG %, 53.7%, 77th percentileDavid Steckel: Rating, +2.8 goals above replacement, 65th percentileDavid Steckel: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 12th percentileDavid Steckel: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 48th percentileDavid Steckel: Finishing, -1.5 goals above expected, 30th percentileColin Fraser: Goals, 0.06 a game, 14th percentileColin Fraser: Assists, 0.15 a game, 32nd percentileColin Fraser: Points, 0.21 a game, 21st percentileColin Fraser: Shots, 0.56 a game, 5th percentileColin Fraser: Hits, 2.09 a game, 84th percentileColin Fraser: Corsi for %, 50.9%, 60th percentileColin Fraser: CF% rel, -7.6, 5th percentileColin Fraser: On-ice xG %, 49.2%, 46th percentileColin Fraser: Rating, +0.0 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileColin Fraser: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 14th percentileColin Fraser: Shot quality, 9.7% a shot, 96th percentileColin Fraser: Finishing, -0.6 goals above expected, 45th percentile
024620David Steckel 7Colin Fraser 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

David Steckel
Colin Fraser

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

David Steckel C, ANA 2012-13 Colin Fraser C, STL
34 Games played 34
1 Goals 2
6 Assists 5
7 Points 7
0.21 Points per game 0.21
0 Plus/minus -4
23 Shots 19
4.3 Shooting % 10.5
41 Hits 71
4 Penalty minutes 25
9:16 Average ice time 9:22
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.2 Corsi for % 50.9
-4.0 CF% relative to team -7.6
47.6 Fenwick for % 46.5
53.7 Expected goals for % 49.2
+4.0 xGF% relative to team -10.4
47.1 Goals for % 40.9
99.1 PDO 97.4
33 Shot attempts taken 38
Expected goals, all situations
2.5 Expected goals 2.6
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.49
7.4% Chance per attempt 9.7%
-1.5 Goals above expected -0.6
Rating, in goals
+2.8 Goals above replacement +0.0
+0.5 Wins above replacement +0.0
+0.0 Even-strength offence -0.8
+1.3 Even-strength defence -0.1
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.4 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.2 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$1.1M Cap hit $825K
$157K Cap dollars per point $118K
$3M Worth at the going rate $548K
+$1.9M Value: worth minus cap hit -$277K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean