Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

David Steckel Tomas Tatar

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDavid Steckel: Goals, 0.03 a game, 6th percentileDavid Steckel: Assists, 0.18 a game, 40th percentileDavid Steckel: Points, 0.21 a game, 21st percentileDavid Steckel: Shots, 0.68 a game, 7th percentileDavid Steckel: Hits, 1.21 a game, 54th percentileDavid Steckel: Corsi for %, 45.2%, 14th percentileDavid Steckel: CF% rel, -4.0, 18th percentileDavid Steckel: On-ice xG %, 53.7%, 77th percentileDavid Steckel: Rating, +2.8 goals above replacement, 65th percentileDavid Steckel: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 12th percentileDavid Steckel: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 48th percentileDavid Steckel: Finishing, -1.5 goals above expected, 30th percentileTomas Tatar: Goals, 0.22 a game, 68th percentileTomas Tatar: Assists, 0.17 a game, 37th percentileTomas Tatar: Points, 0.39 a game, 51st percentileTomas Tatar: Shots, 1.78 a game, 57th percentileTomas Tatar: Hits, 0.50 a game, 16th percentileTomas Tatar: Corsi for %, 60.6%, 99th percentileTomas Tatar: CF% rel, 11.7, 99th percentileTomas Tatar: On-ice xG %, 59.2%, 95th percentileTomas Tatar: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 60th percentileTomas Tatar: Chances created, 1.03 xG per 60, 92nd percentileTomas Tatar: Shot quality, 8.2% a shot, 76th percentileTomas Tatar: Finishing, +0.5 goals above expected, 57th percentile
024620David Steckel 7Tomas Tatar 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

David Steckel
Tomas Tatar

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

David Steckel C, ANA 2012-13 Tomas Tatar L, NJD
34 Games played 18
1 Goals 4
6 Assists 3
7 Points 7
0.21 Points per game 0.39
0 Plus/minus 2
23 Shots 32
4.3 Shooting % 12.5
41 Hits 9
4 Penalty minutes 4
9:16 Average ice time 11:22
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.2 Corsi for % 60.6
-4.0 CF% relative to team +11.7
47.6 Fenwick for % 60.0
53.7 Expected goals for % 59.2
+4.0 xGF% relative to team +10.1
47.1 Goals for % 61.5
99.1 PDO 101.3
33 Shot attempts taken 45
Expected goals, all situations
2.5 Expected goals 3.5
0.48 Expected goals per 60 1.03
7.4% Chance per attempt 8.2%
-1.5 Goals above expected +0.5
Rating, in goals
+2.8 Goals above replacement +2.5
+0.5 Wins above replacement +0.4
+0.0 Even-strength offence +0.4
+1.3 Even-strength defence +1.0
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.4 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.2 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$1.1M Cap hit $630K
$157K Cap dollars per point $90K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean