Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Tim Jackman James Wright

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTim Jackman: Goals, 0.02 a game, 5th percentileTim Jackman: Assists, 0.10 a game, 19th percentileTim Jackman: Points, 0.12 a game, 10th percentileTim Jackman: Shots, 1.00 a game, 16th percentileTim Jackman: Hits, 2.33 a game, 90th percentileTim Jackman: Corsi for %, 48.0%, 33rd percentileTim Jackman: CF% rel, -0.2, 50th percentileTim Jackman: On-ice xG %, 45.8%, 22nd percentileTim Jackman: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 34th percentileTim Jackman: Chances created, 0.81 xG per 60, 68th percentileTim Jackman: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 52nd percentileTim Jackman: Finishing, -3.3 goals above expected, 12th percentileJames Wright: Goals, 0.05 a game, 12th percentileJames Wright: Assists, 0.08 a game, 14th percentileJames Wright: Points, 0.13 a game, 11th percentileJames Wright: Shots, 0.84 a game, 11th percentileJames Wright: Hits, 1.13 a game, 50th percentileJames Wright: Corsi for %, 44.7%, 12th percentileJames Wright: CF% rel, -5.8, 10th percentileJames Wright: On-ice xG %, 44.0%, 12th percentileJames Wright: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 26th percentileJames Wright: Chances created, 0.37 xG per 60, 4th percentileJames Wright: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 19th percentileJames Wright: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 42nd percentile
0123452040Tim Jackman 5James Wright 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tim Jackman
James Wright

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tim Jackman R, ANA 2012-13 James Wright C, WPG
42 Games played 38
1 Goals 2
4 Assists 3
5 Points 5
0.12 Points per game 0.13
-9 Plus/minus -5
42 Shots 32
2.4 Shooting % 6.3
98 Hits 43
76 Penalty minutes 31
7:36 Average ice time 11:36
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.0 Corsi for % 44.7
-0.2 CF% relative to team -5.8
48.7 Fenwick for % 45.6
45.8 Expected goals for % 44.0
-3.1 xGF% relative to team -7.2
26.3 Goals for % 40.0
94.6 PDO 98.3
66 Shot attempts taken 52
Expected goals, all situations
4.3 Expected goals 2.7
0.81 Expected goals per 60 0.37
7.5% Chance per attempt 6.4%
-3.3 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
+0.8 Goals above replacement +0.3
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.0
-0.7 Even-strength offence -2.7
+0.4 Even-strength defence +0.2
+0.4 Power play +0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
-0.1 Penalties +1.4
Contract
$612K Cap hit $650K
$122K Cap dollars per point $130K
$1.2M Worth at the going rate $749K
+$604K Value: worth minus cap hit +$99K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean