Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Chris Thorburn Brandon Tanev

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Thorburn: Goals, 0.05 a game, 8th percentileChris Thorburn: Assists, 0.02 a game, 1st percentileChris Thorburn: Points, 0.06 a game, 1st percentileChris Thorburn: Shots, 0.56 a game, 1st percentileChris Thorburn: Hits, 1.41 a game, 70th percentileChris Thorburn: Corsi for %, 44.7%, 6th percentileChris Thorburn: CF% rel, -4.3, 10th percentileChris Thorburn: On-ice xG %, 43.4%, 8th percentileChris Thorburn: Rating, -3.0 goals above replacement, 3rd percentileChris Thorburn: Chances created, 0.37 xG per 60, 1st percentileChris Thorburn: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 9th percentileChris Thorburn: Finishing, +0.2 goals above expected, 56th percentileBrandon Tanev: Goals, 0.04 a game, 6th percentileBrandon Tanev: Assists, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileBrandon Tanev: Points, 0.08 a game, 3rd percentileBrandon Tanev: Shots, 1.06 a game, 17th percentileBrandon Tanev: Hits, 2.51 a game, 94th percentileBrandon Tanev: Corsi for %, 43.1%, 3rd percentileBrandon Tanev: CF% rel, -6.9, 4th percentileBrandon Tanev: On-ice xG %, 44.0%, 10th percentileBrandon Tanev: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileBrandon Tanev: Chances created, 0.47 xG per 60, 7th percentileBrandon Tanev: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 10th percentileBrandon Tanev: Finishing, -2.2 goals above expected, 30th percentile
01234204060Chris Thorburn 4Brandon Tanev 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Thorburn
Brandon Tanev

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Thorburn R, STL 2016-17 Brandon Tanev L, UTA
64 Games played 51
3 Goals 2
1 Assists 2
4 Points 4
0.06 Points per game 0.08
-7 Plus/minus -6
36 Shots 54
8.3 Shooting % 3.7
90 Hits 128
95 Penalty minutes 26
6:59 Average ice time 10:41
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.7 Corsi for % 43.1
-4.3 CF% relative to team -6.9
44.9 Fenwick for % 42.8
43.4 Expected goals for % 44.0
-8.0 xGF% relative to team -6.6
33.3 Goals for % 35.0
96.2 PDO 98.3
59 Shot attempts taken 79
Expected goals, all situations
2.8 Expected goals 4.2
0.37 Expected goals per 60 0.47
6.2% Chance per attempt 6.2%
+0.2 Goals above expected -2.2
Rating, in goals
-3.0 Goals above replacement +1.0
-0.5 Wins above replacement +0.2
-3.4 Even-strength offence -3.4
+0.6 Even-strength defence +1.7
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.2
-1.5 Penalties +1.5
Contract
$1.2M Cap hit $874K
$300K Cap dollars per point $219K
-$1.3M Worth at the going rate $1.2M
-$2.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$367K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean