Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Kyle Wellwood Nate Thompson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKyle Wellwood: Goals, 0.15 a game, 47th percentileKyle Wellwood: Assists, 0.23 a game, 53rd percentileKyle Wellwood: Points, 0.38 a game, 50th percentileKyle Wellwood: Shots, 0.95 a game, 15th percentileKyle Wellwood: Hits, 0.26 a game, 4th percentileKyle Wellwood: Corsi for %, 50.9%, 60th percentileKyle Wellwood: CF% rel, 1.4, 65th percentileKyle Wellwood: On-ice xG %, 52.1%, 69th percentileKyle Wellwood: Rating, +2.4 goals above replacement, 57th percentileKyle Wellwood: Chances created, 0.44 xG per 60, 8th percentileKyle Wellwood: Shot quality, 8.0% a shot, 69th percentileKyle Wellwood: Finishing, +2.3 goals above expected, 79th percentileNate Thompson: Goals, 0.16 a game, 48th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.18 a game, 41st percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.33 a game, 42nd percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.29 a game, 34th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 1.89 a game, 78th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 44.1%, 11th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -3.7, 20th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 44.5%, 15th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +1.1 goals above replacement, 39th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 14th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 18th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, +1.7 goals above expected, 73rd percentile
0510152040Kyle Wellwood 15Nate Thompson 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kyle Wellwood
Nate Thompson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kyle Wellwood C, WPG 2012-13 Nate Thompson C, PHI
39 Games played 45
6 Goals 7
9 Assists 8
15 Points 15
0.38 Points per game 0.33
0 Plus/minus -2
37 Shots 58
16.2 Shooting % 12.1
10 Hits 85
2 Penalty minutes 17
12:59 Average ice time 14:20
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.9 Corsi for % 44.1
+1.4 CF% relative to team -3.7
52.0 Fenwick for % 45.5
52.1 Expected goals for % 44.5
+3.1 xGF% relative to team -4.4
52.9 Goals for % 47.2
101.0 PDO 100.2
57 Shot attempts taken 97
Expected goals, all situations
3.7 Expected goals 5.3
0.44 Expected goals per 60 0.50
8.0% Chance per attempt 6.4%
+2.3 Goals above expected +1.7
Rating, in goals
+2.4 Goals above replacement +1.1
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.2
+0.1 Even-strength offence -0.2
+0.8 Even-strength defence +0.2
-0.5 Power play -0.1
0.0 Penalty kill -0.7
+0.6 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$1.6M Cap hit $900K
$107K Cap dollars per point $60K
$2.6M Worth at the going rate $1.4M
+$977K Value: worth minus cap hit +$549K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean