Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Mike Smith Corey Crawford

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMike Smith: Save %, 0.914, 44th percentileMike Smith: Goals against, 2.84 a game, 4th percentileMike Smith: Workload, 33.1 shots a game, 98th percentileMike Smith: Games, 55 games, 64th percentileMike Smith: Goals saved, +0.23 above expected per 60, 75th percentileCorey Crawford: Save %, 0.918, 67th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals against, 2.51 a game, 35th percentileCorey Crawford: Workload, 30.7 shots a game, 82nd percentileCorey Crawford: Games, 55 games, 64th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals saved, +0.09 above expected per 60, 58th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Mike Smith G, EDM 2016-17 Corey Crawford G, CHI
55 Games played 55
19 Wins 32
26 Losses 18
3 Shutouts 2
1,819 Shots against 1,691
1,663 Saves 1,553
156 Goals against 138
0.914 Save % 0.918
2.92 Goals against average 2.55
Expected goals, while he was in net
168.1 Expected goals against 143.1
+12.1 Goals saved above expected +5.1
+0.23 Saved above expected per 60 +0.09
6.3% Chance per attempt faced 6.3%
Rating, in goals
+29.2 Goals above replacement +19.6
+4.9 Wins above replacement +3.3
Contract
$5.667M Cap hit $6M
$6.9M Worth at the going rate $4.8M
+$1.2M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean