Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Mike Smith Thomas Greiss

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMike Smith: Save %, 0.898, 16th percentileMike Smith: Goals against, 2.60 a game, 53rd percentileMike Smith: Workload, 25.5 shots a game, 9th percentileMike Smith: Games, 42 games, 55th percentileMike Smith: Goals saved, -0.17 above expected per 60, 27th percentileThomas Greiss: Save %, 0.927, 92nd percentileThomas Greiss: Goals against, 2.02 a game, 92nd percentileThomas Greiss: Workload, 27.6 shots a game, 19th percentileThomas Greiss: Games, 43 games, 56th percentileThomas Greiss: Goals saved, +0.46 above expected per 60, 90th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 64 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Mike Smith G, EDM 2018-19 Thomas Greiss G, STL
42 Games played 43
23 Wins 23
16 Losses 14
2 Shutouts 5
1,069 Shots against 1,185
960 Saves 1,098
109 Goals against 87
0.898 Save % 0.927
2.72 Goals against average 2.28
Expected goals, while he was in net
102.1 Expected goals against 104.4
-6.9 Goals saved above expected +17.4
-0.17 Saved above expected per 60 +0.46
6.8% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
+3.5 Goals above replacement +28.1
+0.6 Wins above replacement +4.7
Contract
$5.667M Cap hit $3.333M
$1.4M Worth at the going rate $6.4M
-$4.3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean