Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Mike Smith Steve Mason

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMike Smith: Save %, 0.914, 44th percentileMike Smith: Goals against, 2.84 a game, 4th percentileMike Smith: Workload, 33.1 shots a game, 98th percentileMike Smith: Games, 55 games, 64th percentileMike Smith: Goals saved, +0.23 above expected per 60, 75th percentileSteve Mason: Save %, 0.908, 20th percentileSteve Mason: Goals against, 2.47 a game, 42nd percentileSteve Mason: Workload, 26.8 shots a game, 33rd percentileSteve Mason: Games, 58 games, 71st percentileSteve Mason: Goals saved, -0.16 above expected per 60, 16th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Mike Smith G, EDM 2016-17 Steve Mason G, WPG
55 Games played 58
19 Wins 26
26 Losses 21
3 Shutouts 3
1,819 Shots against 1,556
1,663 Saves 1,413
156 Goals against 143
0.914 Save % 0.908
2.92 Goals against average 2.66
Expected goals, while he was in net
168.1 Expected goals against 134.7
+12.1 Goals saved above expected -8.3
+0.23 Saved above expected per 60 -0.16
6.3% Chance per attempt faced 6.2%
Rating, in goals
+29.2 Goals above replacement +5.4
+4.9 Wins above replacement +0.9
Contract
$5.667M Cap hit $4.1M
$6.9M Worth at the going rate $1.7M
+$1.2M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean