Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2020-21 season

At a glance

Mike Smith Martin Jones

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMike Smith: Save %, 0.923, 89th percentileMike Smith: Goals against, 2.22 a game, 78th percentileMike Smith: Workload, 28.8 shots a game, 68th percentileMike Smith: Games, 32 games, 66th percentileMike Smith: Goals saved, +0.40 above expected per 60, 83rd percentileMartin Jones: Save %, 0.896, 18th percentileMartin Jones: Goals against, 3.00 a game, 11th percentileMartin Jones: Workload, 28.8 shots a game, 69th percentileMartin Jones: Games, 34 games, 72nd percentileMartin Jones: Goals saved, -0.24 above expected per 60, 27th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 65 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Mike Smith G, EDM 2020-21 Martin Jones G, TOR
32 Games played 34
21 Wins 15
6 Losses 13
3 Shutouts 1
921 Shots against 980
850 Saves 878
71 Goals against 102
0.923 Save % 0.896
2.31 Goals against average 3.28
Expected goals, while he was in net
83.2 Expected goals against 94.6
+12.2 Goals saved above expected -7.4
+0.40 Saved above expected per 60 -0.24
6.5% Chance per attempt faced 6.8%
Rating, in goals
+20.7 Goals above replacement +2.2
+3.4 Wins above replacement +0.4
Contract
$1.5M Cap hit $5.75M
$6.9M Worth at the going rate $1.4M
+$5.4M Value: worth minus cap hit -$4.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean