Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Mike Smith Eddie Lack

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMike Smith: Save %, 0.916, 50th percentileMike Smith: Goals against, 2.41 a game, 48th percentileMike Smith: Workload, 28.8 shots a game, 73rd percentileMike Smith: Games, 32 games, 35th percentileMike Smith: Goals saved, 0.00 above expected per 60, 47th percentileEddie Lack: Save %, 0.901, 6th percentileEddie Lack: Goals against, 2.65 a game, 11th percentileEddie Lack: Workload, 26.8 shots a game, 34th percentileEddie Lack: Games, 34 games, 42nd percentileEddie Lack: Goals saved, -0.10 above expected per 60, 32nd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Mike Smith G, EDM 2015-16 Eddie Lack G, NJD
32 Games played 34
15 Wins 12
13 Losses 14
3 Shutouts 2
921 Shots against 910
844 Saves 820
77 Goals against 90
0.916 Save % 0.901
2.63 Goals against average 2.81
Expected goals, while he was in net
77.0 Expected goals against 86.8
0.0 Goals saved above expected -3.2
0.00 Saved above expected per 60 -0.10
5.8% Chance per attempt faced 6.6%
Rating, in goals
+7.8 Goals above replacement +5.7
+1.3 Wins above replacement +0.9
Contract
$5.667M Cap hit $1.15M
$2.4M Worth at the going rate $1.9M
-$3.2M Value: worth minus cap hit +$778K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean