Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

David Moss Travis Zajac

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDavid Moss: Goals, 0.11 a game, 34th percentileDavid Moss: Assists, 0.33 a game, 71st percentileDavid Moss: Points, 0.44 a game, 57th percentileDavid Moss: Shots, 1.82 a game, 58th percentileDavid Moss: Hits, 1.62 a game, 70th percentileDavid Moss: Corsi for %, 52.4%, 73rd percentileDavid Moss: CF% rel, 2.7, 76th percentileDavid Moss: On-ice xG %, 55.6%, 84th percentileDavid Moss: Rating, +7.6 goals above replacement, 91st percentileDavid Moss: Chances created, 0.74 xG per 60, 58th percentileDavid Moss: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 54th percentileDavid Moss: Finishing, -4.7 goals above expected, 3rd percentileTravis Zajac: Goals, 0.15 a game, 44th percentileTravis Zajac: Assists, 0.27 a game, 60th percentileTravis Zajac: Points, 0.42 a game, 54th percentileTravis Zajac: Shots, 1.71 a game, 53rd percentileTravis Zajac: Hits, 0.69 a game, 26th percentileTravis Zajac: Corsi for %, 57.1%, 93rd percentileTravis Zajac: CF% rel, 1.7, 67th percentileTravis Zajac: On-ice xG %, 57.5%, 90th percentileTravis Zajac: Rating, +3.2 goals above replacement, 69th percentileTravis Zajac: Chances created, 0.69 xG per 60, 48th percentileTravis Zajac: Shot quality, 9.0% a shot, 92nd percentileTravis Zajac: Finishing, -3.8 goals above expected, 8th percentile
051015202040David Moss 20Travis Zajac 20

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

David Moss
Travis Zajac

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

David Moss R, ARI 2012-13 Travis Zajac C, NYI
45 Games played 48
5 Goals 7
15 Assists 13
20 Points 20
0.44 Points per game 0.42
3 Plus/minus -5
82 Shots 82
6.1 Shooting % 8.5
73 Hits 33
21 Penalty minutes 22
15:33 Average ice time 19:32
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.4 Corsi for % 57.1
+2.7 CF% relative to team +1.7
53.5 Fenwick for % 56.3
55.6 Expected goals for % 57.5
+8.4 xGF% relative to team +1.1
55.0 Goals for % 48.6
100.5 PDO 98.4
136 Shot attempts taken 107
Expected goals, all situations
8.7 Expected goals 10.8
0.74 Expected goals per 60 0.69
7.6% Chance per attempt 9.0%
-4.7 Goals above expected -3.8
Rating, in goals
+7.6 Goals above replacement +3.2
+1.3 Wins above replacement +0.5
+2.8 Even-strength offence -0.2
+2.0 Even-strength defence +0.4
+0.1 Power play -0.5
-0.2 Penalty kill +0.1
+1.1 Penalties +0.8
Contract
$2.1M Cap hit $3.888M
$105K Cap dollars per point $194K
$7.1M Worth at the going rate $3.3M
+$5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$566K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean