Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

David Moss Jacob Josefson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDavid Moss: Goals, 0.06 a game, 20th percentileDavid Moss: Assists, 0.22 a game, 50th percentileDavid Moss: Points, 0.28 a game, 38th percentileDavid Moss: Shots, 2.56 a game, 83rd percentileDavid Moss: Hits, 1.34 a game, 63rd percentileDavid Moss: Corsi for %, 53.3%, 78th percentileDavid Moss: CF% rel, 4.7, 87th percentileDavid Moss: On-ice xG %, 53.8%, 80th percentileDavid Moss: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 39th percentileDavid Moss: Chances created, 0.93 xG per 60, 80th percentileDavid Moss: Shot quality, 6.5% a shot, 22nd percentileDavid Moss: Finishing, -5.0 goals above expected, 9th percentileJacob Josefson: Goals, 0.05 a game, 12th percentileJacob Josefson: Assists, 0.17 a game, 40th percentileJacob Josefson: Points, 0.22 a game, 27th percentileJacob Josefson: Shots, 0.90 a game, 15th percentileJacob Josefson: Hits, 0.39 a game, 9th percentileJacob Josefson: Corsi for %, 53.4%, 81st percentileJacob Josefson: CF% rel, 2.4, 71st percentileJacob Josefson: On-ice xG %, 52.8%, 73rd percentileJacob Josefson: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 39th percentileJacob Josefson: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 13th percentileJacob Josefson: Shot quality, 8.2% a shot, 74th percentileJacob Josefson: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 33rd percentile
024682040David Moss 9Jacob Josefson 9

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

David Moss
Jacob Josefson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

David Moss R, ARI 2011-12 Jacob Josefson C, BUF
32 Games played 41
2 Goals 2
7 Assists 7
9 Points 9
0.28 Points per game 0.22
-3 Plus/minus 10
82 Shots 37
2.4 Shooting % 5.4
43 Hits 16
12 Penalty minutes 6
14:01 Average ice time 12:06
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.3 Corsi for % 53.4
+4.7 CF% relative to team +2.4
53.7 Fenwick for % 53.1
53.8 Expected goals for % 52.8
+2.0 xGF% relative to team +1.3
39.1 Goals for % 73.7
96.5 PDO 104.8
125 Shot attempts taken 54
Expected goals, all situations
7.0 Expected goals 4.1
0.93 Expected goals per 60 0.49
6.5% Chance per attempt 8.2%
-5.0 Goals above expected -2.1
Rating, in goals
+1.5 Goals above replacement +1.5
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.2
+0.6 Even-strength offence -0.4
+0.9 Even-strength defence +0.3
-0.2 Power play -0.1
-0.9 Penalty kill -0.2
-0.1 Penalties +0.6

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean