Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Rick Nash Kris Versteeg

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRick Nash: Goals, 0.34 a game, 90th percentileRick Nash: Assists, 0.22 a game, 52nd percentileRick Nash: Points, 0.57 a game, 71st percentileRick Nash: Shots, 2.91 a game, 94th percentileRick Nash: Hits, 0.94 a game, 48th percentileRick Nash: Corsi for %, 46.7%, 17th percentileRick Nash: CF% rel, -1.2, 35th percentileRick Nash: On-ice xG %, 50.6%, 53rd percentileRick Nash: Rating, +8.1 goals above replacement, 84th percentileRick Nash: Chances created, 1.16 xG per 60, 96th percentileRick Nash: Shot quality, 8.1% a shot, 66th percentileRick Nash: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 50th percentileKris Versteeg: Goals, 0.22 a game, 67th percentileKris Versteeg: Assists, 0.32 a game, 70th percentileKris Versteeg: Points, 0.54 a game, 67th percentileKris Versteeg: Shots, 1.97 a game, 66th percentileKris Versteeg: Hits, 0.07 a game, 1st percentileKris Versteeg: Corsi for %, 47.3%, 22nd percentileKris Versteeg: CF% rel, -3.9, 13th percentileKris Versteeg: On-ice xG %, 40.6%, 2nd percentileKris Versteeg: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 28th percentileKris Versteeg: Chances created, 0.53 xG per 60, 15th percentileKris Versteeg: Shot quality, 5.1% a shot, 1st percentileKris Versteeg: Finishing, +5.0 goals above expected, 89th percentile
0102030204060Rick Nash 38Kris Versteeg 37

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Rick Nash
Kris Versteeg

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Rick Nash L, BOS 2016-17 Kris Versteeg R, CGY
67 Games played 69
23 Goals 15
15 Assists 22
38 Points 37
0.57 Points per game 0.54
9 Plus/minus -3
195 Shots 136
11.8 Shooting % 11.0
63 Hits 5
26 Penalty minutes 46
16:28 Average ice time 14:44
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.7 Corsi for % 47.3
-1.2 CF% relative to team -3.9
48.0 Fenwick for % 45.9
50.6 Expected goals for % 40.6
+1.3 xGF% relative to team -10.9
51.4 Goals for % 50.0
101.4 PDO 101.1
244 Shot attempts taken 139
Expected goals, all situations
21.4 Expected goals 9.0
1.16 Expected goals per 60 0.53
8.1% Chance per attempt 5.1%
-0.4 Goals above expected +5.0
Rating, in goals
+8.1 Goals above replacement +0.6
+1.3 Wins above replacement +0.1
+4.3 Even-strength offence -3.8
-1.3 Even-strength defence 0.0
+0.6 Power play +0.9
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
+1.4 Penalties +0.8
Contract
$7.8M Cap hit $950K
$205K Cap dollars per point $26K
$5.7M Worth at the going rate $985K
-$2.1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$35K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean