Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Adam Burish Torrey Mitchell

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAdam Burish: Goals, 0.09 a game, 31st percentileAdam Burish: Assists, 0.20 a game, 47th percentileAdam Burish: Points, 0.29 a game, 40th percentileAdam Burish: Shots, 1.26 a game, 31st percentileAdam Burish: Hits, 1.06 a game, 47th percentileAdam Burish: Corsi for %, 49.6%, 44th percentileAdam Burish: CF% rel, 0.5, 53rd percentileAdam Burish: On-ice xG %, 48.2%, 35th percentileAdam Burish: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 48th percentileAdam Burish: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 18th percentileAdam Burish: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 20th percentileAdam Burish: Finishing, -1.2 goals above expected, 40th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Goals, 0.12 a game, 37th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Assists, 0.13 a game, 30th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Points, 0.25 a game, 32nd percentileTorrey Mitchell: Shots, 1.32 a game, 34th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Hits, 1.24 a game, 58th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 49th percentileTorrey Mitchell: CF% rel, -2.8, 22nd percentileTorrey Mitchell: On-ice xG %, 54.3%, 84th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 49th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 17th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 19th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 50th percentile
051015204060Adam Burish 19Torrey Mitchell 19

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Adam Burish
Torrey Mitchell

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Adam Burish R, SJS 2011-12 Torrey Mitchell C, LAK
65 Games played 76
6 Goals 9
13 Assists 10
19 Points 19
0.29 Points per game 0.25
6 Plus/minus -6
82 Shots 100
7.3 Shooting % 9.0
69 Hits 94
76 Penalty minutes 29
12:47 Average ice time 12:26
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.6 Corsi for % 49.8
+0.5 CF% relative to team -2.8
49.3 Fenwick for % 51.4
48.2 Expected goals for % 54.3
+0.5 xGF% relative to team -0.7
51.2 Goals for % 44.6
100.8 PDO 98.2
126 Shot attempts taken 159
Expected goals, all situations
7.2 Expected goals 8.2
0.52 Expected goals per 60 0.52
6.4% Chance per attempt 6.3%
-1.2 Goals above expected -0.2
Rating, in goals
+2.5 Goals above replacement +2.6
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.4
-1.0 Even-strength offence -2.1
+1.8 Even-strength defence +1.6
-0.1 Power play -0.1
-0.4 Penalty kill -0.9
-0.1 Penalties +1.5

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean