Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Paul Ranger Nicklas Grossmann

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPaul Ranger: Goals, 0.11 a game, 82nd percentilePaul Ranger: Assists, 0.15 a game, 33rd percentilePaul Ranger: Points, 0.26 a game, 52nd percentilePaul Ranger: Shots, 1.11 a game, 37th percentilePaul Ranger: Hits, 2.17 a game, 82nd percentilePaul Ranger: Corsi for %, 42.4%, 4th percentilePaul Ranger: CF% rel, 0.4, 56th percentilePaul Ranger: On-ice xG %, 43.1%, 8th percentilePaul Ranger: Rating, +3.8 goals above replacement, 67th percentilePaul Ranger: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 56th percentilePaul Ranger: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 70th percentilePaul Ranger: Finishing, +1.9 goals above expected, 81st percentileNicklas Grossmann: Goals, 0.01 a game, 9th percentileNicklas Grossmann: Assists, 0.17 a game, 38th percentileNicklas Grossmann: Points, 0.18 a game, 24th percentileNicklas Grossmann: Shots, 0.91 a game, 21st percentileNicklas Grossmann: Hits, 2.42 a game, 89th percentileNicklas Grossmann: Corsi for %, 47.2%, 22nd percentileNicklas Grossmann: CF% rel, -4.3, 11th percentileNicklas Grossmann: On-ice xG %, 48.4%, 33rd percentileNicklas Grossmann: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 37th percentileNicklas Grossmann: Chances created, 0.12 xG per 60, 19th percentileNicklas Grossmann: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 14th percentileNicklas Grossmann: Finishing, -1.9 goals above expected, 14th percentile
0510204060Paul Ranger 14Nicklas Grossmann 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Paul Ranger
Nicklas Grossmann

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Paul Ranger D, TOR 2013-14 Nicklas Grossmann D, CGY
53 Games played 78
6 Goals 1
8 Assists 13
14 Points 14
0.26 Points per game 0.18
-1 Plus/minus -6
59 Shots 71
10.2 Shooting % 1.4
115 Hits 189
36 Penalty minutes 55
17:25 Average ice time 19:07
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
42.4 Corsi for % 47.2
+0.4 CF% relative to team -4.3
41.9 Fenwick for % 47.5
43.1 Expected goals for % 48.4
+1.4 xGF% relative to team -2.3
47.5 Goals for % 43.5
101.2 PDO 99.3
108 Shot attempts taken 164
Expected goals, all situations
3.1 Expected goals 2.9
0.20 Expected goals per 60 0.12
3.6% Chance per attempt 2.4%
+1.9 Goals above expected -1.9
Rating, in goals
+3.8 Goals above replacement +0.6
+0.6 Wins above replacement +0.1
+1.4 Even-strength offence -3.6
+1.0 Even-strength defence +0.2
-0.1 Power play -0.1
-0.1 Penalty kill +1.1
-1.4 Penalties -1.9
Contract
$1M Cap hit $3.5M
$71K Cap dollars per point $250K
$2.7M Worth at the going rate $895K
+$1.7M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean