Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Kari Lehtonen Chad Johnson

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerKari Lehtonen: Save %, 0.906, 19th percentileKari Lehtonen: Goals against, 2.44 a game, 44th percentileKari Lehtonen: Workload, 26.1 shots a game, 21st percentileKari Lehtonen: Games, 43 games, 60th percentileKari Lehtonen: Goals saved, -0.09 above expected per 60, 35th percentileChad Johnson: Save %, 0.920, 73rd percentileChad Johnson: Goals against, 2.27 a game, 61st percentileChad Johnson: Workload, 28.2 shots a game, 65th percentileChad Johnson: Games, 45 games, 63rd percentileChad Johnson: Goals saved, +0.17 above expected per 60, 79th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Kari Lehtonen G, DAL 2015-16 Chad Johnson G, ANA
43 Games played 45
25 Wins 22
10 Losses 16
2 Shutouts 1
1,121 Shots against 1,270
1,016 Saves 1,168
105 Goals against 102
0.906 Save % 0.920
2.76 Goals against average 2.36
Expected goals, while he was in net
101.6 Expected goals against 109.5
-3.4 Goals saved above expected +7.5
-0.09 Saved above expected per 60 +0.17
6.3% Chance per attempt faced 6.1%
Rating, in goals
+7.0 Goals above replacement +18.7
+1.2 Wins above replacement +3.1
Contract
$5.9M Cap hit $1.3M
$2.2M Worth at the going rate $5M
-$3.7M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.7M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean