Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Curtis McElhinney Linus Ullmark

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCurtis McElhinney: Save %, 0.890, 2nd percentileCurtis McElhinney: Goals against, 2.56 a game, 21st percentileCurtis McElhinney: Workload, 23.2 shots a game, 2nd percentileCurtis McElhinney: Games, 18 games, 3rd percentileCurtis McElhinney: Goals saved, -0.29 above expected per 60, 14th percentileLinus Ullmark: Save %, 0.913, 35th percentileLinus Ullmark: Goals against, 2.45 a game, 39th percentileLinus Ullmark: Workload, 28.3 shots a game, 66th percentileLinus Ullmark: Games, 20 games, 6th percentileLinus Ullmark: Goals saved, -0.37 above expected per 60, 7th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Curtis McElhinney G, TBL 2015-16 Linus Ullmark G, OTT
18 Games played 20
2 Wins 8
7 Losses 10
0 Shutouts 0
417 Shots against 565
371 Saves 516
46 Goals against 49
0.890 Save % 0.913
3.30 Goals against average 2.60
Expected goals, while he was in net
41.9 Expected goals against 42.1
-4.1 Goals saved above expected -6.9
-0.29 Saved above expected per 60 -0.37
7.1% Chance per attempt faced 5.4%
Rating, in goals
+0.2 Goals above replacement -2.6
+0.0 Wins above replacement -0.4
Contract
$800K Cap hit $776K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean