Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Curtis McElhinney Juuse Saros

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCurtis McElhinney: Save %, 0.917, 62nd percentileCurtis McElhinney: Goals against, 2.43 a game, 45th percentileCurtis McElhinney: Workload, 29.3 shots a game, 67th percentileCurtis McElhinney: Games, 21 games, 5th percentileCurtis McElhinney: Goals saved, +0.21 above expected per 60, 73rd percentileJuuse Saros: Save %, 0.923, 82nd percentileJuuse Saros: Goals against, 2.24 a game, 73rd percentileJuuse Saros: Workload, 29.2 shots a game, 64th percentileJuuse Saros: Games, 21 games, 5th percentileJuuse Saros: Goals saved, +0.29 above expected per 60, 82nd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Curtis McElhinney G, TBL 2016-17 Juuse Saros G, NSH
21 Games played 21
8 Wins 10
8 Losses 8
1 Shutouts 1
616 Shots against 614
565 Saves 567
51 Goals against 47
0.917 Save % 0.923
2.70 Goals against average 2.35
Expected goals, while he was in net
55.0 Expected goals against 52.7
+4.0 Goals saved above expected +5.7
+0.21 Saved above expected per 60 +0.29
6.4% Chance per attempt faced 5.9%
Rating, in goals
+9.6 Goals above replacement +11.1
+1.6 Wins above replacement +1.8
Contract
$800K Cap hit $693K
$2.7M Worth at the going rate $3M
+$1.9M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean