Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Joakim Lindstrom Emerson Etem

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJoakim Lindstrom: Goals, 0.08 a game, 17th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Assists, 0.11 a game, 22nd percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Points, 0.19 a game, 17th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Shots, 1.15 a game, 22nd percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Hits, 0.26 a game, 3rd percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Corsi for %, 51.0%, 55th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: CF% rel, 2.7, 76th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: On-ice xG %, 48.7%, 40th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Rating, +0.5 goals above replacement, 27th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Chances created, 0.53 xG per 60, 19th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 12th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 32nd percentileEmerson Etem: Goals, 0.11 a game, 28th percentileEmerson Etem: Assists, 0.11 a game, 20th percentileEmerson Etem: Points, 0.22 a game, 23rd percentileEmerson Etem: Shots, 1.71 a game, 53rd percentileEmerson Etem: Hits, 1.40 a game, 59th percentileEmerson Etem: Corsi for %, 53.6%, 77th percentileEmerson Etem: CF% rel, 2.5, 75th percentileEmerson Etem: On-ice xG %, 53.4%, 71st percentileEmerson Etem: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 46th percentileEmerson Etem: Chances created, 0.80 xG per 60, 66th percentileEmerson Etem: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 42nd percentileEmerson Etem: Finishing, -2.3 goals above expected, 31st percentile
02468102040Joakim Lindstrom 10Emerson Etem 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Joakim Lindstrom
Emerson Etem

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Joakim Lindstrom C, TOR 2014-15 Emerson Etem R, ANA
53 Games played 45
4 Goals 5
6 Assists 5
10 Points 10
0.19 Points per game 0.22
-15 Plus/minus -6
61 Shots 77
6.6 Shooting % 6.5
14 Hits 63
12 Penalty minutes 4
10:53 Average ice time 12:15
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.0 Corsi for % 53.6
+2.7 CF% relative to team +2.5
49.9 Fenwick for % 54.1
48.7 Expected goals for % 53.4
+0.8 xGF% relative to team +0.4
26.7 Goals for % 40.6
94.3 PDO 96.7
96 Shot attempts taken 130
Expected goals, all situations
5.1 Expected goals 7.3
0.53 Expected goals per 60 0.80
6.2% Chance per attempt 7.2%
-2.1 Goals above expected -2.3
Rating, in goals
+0.5 Goals above replacement +2.5
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.4
-3.2 Even-strength offence +0.5
+1.5 Even-strength defence -0.4
+0.2 Power play -0.2
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.4 Penalties +1.1
Contract
$700K Cap hit $870K
$70K Cap dollars per point $87K
$829K Worth at the going rate $2.1M
+$129K Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean