Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Max Talbot Nate Thompson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMax Talbot: Goals, 0.06 a game, 13th percentileMax Talbot: Assists, 0.16 a game, 32nd percentileMax Talbot: Points, 0.22 a game, 23rd percentileMax Talbot: Shots, 1.20 a game, 26th percentileMax Talbot: Hits, 1.63 a game, 67th percentileMax Talbot: Corsi for %, 44.2%, 12th percentileMax Talbot: CF% rel, -1.6, 28th percentileMax Talbot: On-ice xG %, 44.3%, 15th percentileMax Talbot: Rating, +3.9 goals above replacement, 56th percentileMax Talbot: Chances created, 0.42 xG per 60, 7th percentileMax Talbot: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 24th percentileMax Talbot: Finishing, -2.7 goals above expected, 24th percentileNate Thompson: Goals, 0.06 a game, 14th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.16 a game, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.23 a game, 24th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.09 a game, 17th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 2.55 a game, 90th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 48.1%, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -4.2, 13th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 47.8%, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 16th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 44th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -3.9 goals above expected, 13th percentile
05101520406080Max Talbot 18Nate Thompson 18

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Max Talbot
Nate Thompson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Max Talbot C, BOS 2014-15 Nate Thompson C, PHI
81 Games played 80
5 Goals 5
13 Assists 13
18 Points 18
0.22 Points per game 0.23
-1 Plus/minus 0
97 Shots 87
5.2 Shooting % 5.7
132 Hits 204
29 Penalty minutes 39
13:37 Average ice time 13:19
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.2 Corsi for % 48.1
-1.6 CF% relative to team -4.2
45.8 Fenwick for % 48.3
44.3 Expected goals for % 47.8
+1.6 xGF% relative to team -5.0
47.8 Goals for % 47.2
99.7 PDO 100.1
136 Shot attempts taken 132
Expected goals, all situations
7.7 Expected goals 8.9
0.42 Expected goals per 60 0.50
6.6% Chance per attempt 7.3%
-2.7 Goals above expected -3.9
Rating, in goals
+3.9 Goals above replacement +1.0
+0.6 Wins above replacement +0.2
-2.1 Even-strength offence -3.6
+3.5 Even-strength defence +1.6
-0.3 Power play -0.2
-1.6 Penalty kill -0.2
+1.4 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$1.8M Cap hit $1.6M
$100K Cap dollars per point $89K
$2.9M Worth at the going rate $1.2M
+$1.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$427K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean