Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Jonathan Ericsson Andrew Ference

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJonathan Ericsson: Goals, 0.07 a game, 60th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Assists, 0.22 a game, 59th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Points, 0.29 a game, 59th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Shots, 0.76 a game, 19th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Hits, 1.49 a game, 61st percentileJonathan Ericsson: Corsi for %, 53.5%, 80th percentileJonathan Ericsson: CF% rel, 0.1, 53rd percentileJonathan Ericsson: On-ice xG %, 55.4%, 86th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Rating, +3.1 goals above replacement, 78th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 12th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Shot quality, 2.6% a shot, 21st percentileJonathan Ericsson: Finishing, +1.6 goals above expected, 82nd percentileAndrew Ference: Goals, 0.08 a game, 64th percentileAndrew Ference: Assists, 0.19 a game, 49th percentileAndrew Ference: Points, 0.27 a game, 57th percentileAndrew Ference: Shots, 1.38 a game, 62nd percentileAndrew Ference: Hits, 1.85 a game, 77th percentileAndrew Ference: Corsi for %, 52.2%, 72nd percentileAndrew Ference: CF% rel, -3.3, 18th percentileAndrew Ference: On-ice xG %, 51.3%, 61st percentileAndrew Ference: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 38th percentileAndrew Ference: Chances created, 0.19 xG per 60, 57th percentileAndrew Ference: Shot quality, 2.9% a shot, 40th percentileAndrew Ference: Finishing, +1.0 goals above expected, 73rd percentile
05102040Jonathan Ericsson 13Andrew Ference 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Jonathan Ericsson
Andrew Ference

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Jonathan Ericsson D, DET 2012-13 Andrew Ference D, EDM
45 Games played 48
3 Goals 4
10 Assists 9
13 Points 13
0.29 Points per game 0.27
6 Plus/minus 9
34 Shots 66
8.8 Shooting % 6.1
67 Hits 89
29 Penalty minutes 35
21:19 Average ice time 19:29
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.5 Corsi for % 52.2
+0.1 CF% relative to team -3.3
53.4 Fenwick for % 51.1
55.4 Expected goals for % 51.3
+3.7 xGF% relative to team -2.3
53.6 Goals for % 51.7
100.4 PDO 100.3
85 Shot attempts taken 141
Expected goals, all situations
1.4 Expected goals 3.0
0.09 Expected goals per 60 0.19
2.6% Chance per attempt 2.9%
+1.6 Goals above expected +1.0
Rating, in goals
+3.1 Goals above replacement +0.6
+0.5 Wins above replacement +0.1
-0.1 Even-strength offence -0.4
+0.1 Even-strength defence -1.3
-0.1 Power play -0.1
+0.5 Penalty kill +0.7
-0.5 Penalties -1.3
Contract
$3.25M Cap hit $2.25M
$250K Cap dollars per point $173K
$3.2M Worth at the going rate $1M
-$31K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean