Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Jonathan Ericsson Ian Cole

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJonathan Ericsson: Goals, 0.02 a game, 16th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Assists, 0.21 a game, 52nd percentileJonathan Ericsson: Points, 0.23 a game, 45th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Shots, 1.38 a game, 55th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Hits, 1.90 a game, 73rd percentileJonathan Ericsson: Corsi for %, 51.7%, 71st percentileJonathan Ericsson: CF% rel, 0.0, 53rd percentileJonathan Ericsson: On-ice xG %, 50.4%, 56th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 30th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Chances created, 0.11 xG per 60, 17th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Shot quality, 2.1% a shot, 6th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 34th percentileIan Cole: Goals, 0.07 a game, 60th percentileIan Cole: Assists, 0.17 a game, 44th percentileIan Cole: Points, 0.24 a game, 48th percentileIan Cole: Shots, 0.98 a game, 27th percentileIan Cole: Hits, 0.52 a game, 10th percentileIan Cole: Corsi for %, 49.2%, 37th percentileIan Cole: CF% rel, -5.7, 3rd percentileIan Cole: On-ice xG %, 53.4%, 80th percentileIan Cole: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 40th percentileIan Cole: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 47th percentileIan Cole: Shot quality, 2.9% a shot, 32nd percentileIan Cole: Finishing, +0.9 goals above expected, 73rd percentile
05102040Jonathan Ericsson 11Ian Cole 11

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Jonathan Ericsson
Ian Cole

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Jonathan Ericsson D, DET 2013-14 Ian Cole D, CHI
48 Games played 46
1 Goals 3
10 Assists 8
11 Points 11
0.23 Points per game 0.24
2 Plus/minus 15
66 Shots 45
1.5 Shooting % 6.7
91 Hits 24
34 Penalty minutes 31
21:15 Average ice time 15:05
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.7 Corsi for % 49.2
+0.0 CF% relative to team -5.7
51.7 Fenwick for % 50.8
50.4 Expected goals for % 53.4
-0.4 xGF% relative to team -4.0
47.9 Goals for % 67.6
99.2 PDO 104.6
110 Shot attempts taken 97
Expected goals, all situations
1.9 Expected goals 2.1
0.11 Expected goals per 60 0.18
2.1% Chance per attempt 2.9%
-0.9 Goals above expected +0.9
Rating, in goals
+0.1 Goals above replacement +0.8
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.1
-0.9 Even-strength offence -1.7
-0.6 Even-strength defence +1.2
-0.4 Power play +0.1
+0.3 Penalty kill 0.0
-1.7 Penalties -1.1
Contract
$3.25M Cap hit $825K
$295K Cap dollars per point $75K
$570K Worth at the going rate $975K
-$2.7M Value: worth minus cap hit +$150K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean