Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Cam Ward Mike Smith

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCam Ward: Save %, 0.915, 52nd percentileCam Ward: Goals against, 2.68 a game, 12th percentileCam Ward: Workload, 31.5 shots a game, 98th percentileCam Ward: Games, 68 games, 86th percentileCam Ward: Goals saved, +0.26 above expected per 60, 83rd percentileMike Smith: Save %, 0.930, 94th percentileMike Smith: Goals against, 2.15 a game, 82nd percentileMike Smith: Workload, 30.8 shots a game, 96th percentileMike Smith: Games, 67 games, 82nd percentileMike Smith: Goals saved, +0.59 above expected per 60, 91st percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 50 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Cam Ward G, CHI 2011-12 Mike Smith G, EDM
68 Games played 67
30 Wins 38
23 Losses 18
5 Shutouts 8
2,143 Shots against 2,066
1,961 Saves 1,922
182 Goals against 144
0.915 Save % 0.930
2.74 Goals against average 2.21
Expected goals, while he was in net
199.3 Expected goals against 182.3
+17.3 Goals saved above expected +38.3
+0.26 Saved above expected per 60 +0.59
6.6% Chance per attempt faced 6.3%
Rating, in goals
+37.6 Goals above replacement +56.8
+6.3 Wins above replacement +9.5
Contract
$6.3M Cap hit $2M
$5.6M Worth at the going rate $8.2M
-$677K Value: worth minus cap hit +$6.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean