Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Cam Ward Steve Mason

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCam Ward: Save %, 0.910, 31st percentileCam Ward: Goals against, 2.37 a game, 46th percentileCam Ward: Workload, 26.5 shots a game, 35th percentileCam Ward: Games, 51 games, 56th percentileCam Ward: Goals saved, -0.01 above expected per 60, 53rd percentileSteve Mason: Save %, 0.928, 93rd percentileSteve Mason: Goals against, 2.12 a game, 87th percentileSteve Mason: Workload, 29.2 shots a game, 70th percentileSteve Mason: Games, 51 games, 56th percentileSteve Mason: Goals saved, +0.31 above expected per 60, 82nd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Cam Ward G, CHI 2014-15 Steve Mason G, WPG
51 Games played 51
22 Wins 18
24 Losses 18
1 Shutouts 3
1,351 Shots against 1,490
1,230 Saves 1,382
121 Goals against 108
0.910 Save % 0.928
2.40 Goals against average 2.25
Expected goals, while he was in net
120.4 Expected goals against 122.8
-0.6 Goals saved above expected +14.8
-0.01 Saved above expected per 60 +0.31
6.2% Chance per attempt faced 6.1%
Rating, in goals
+11.7 Goals above replacement +27.3
+1.9 Wins above replacement +4.6
Contract
$6.3M Cap hit $4.1M
$3.1M Worth at the going rate $6.5M
-$3.2M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean