Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Cam Ward Scott Darling

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCam Ward: Save %, 0.906, 20th percentileCam Ward: Goals against, 2.60 a game, 37th percentileCam Ward: Workload, 27.6 shots a game, 23rd percentileCam Ward: Games, 43 games, 50th percentileCam Ward: Goals saved, -0.22 above expected per 60, 24th percentileScott Darling: Save %, 0.888, 1st percentileScott Darling: Goals against, 3.05 a game, 10th percentileScott Darling: Workload, 27.2 shots a game, 20th percentileScott Darling: Games, 43 games, 50th percentileScott Darling: Goals saved, -0.55 above expected per 60, 3rd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 60 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Cam Ward G, CHI 2017-18 Scott Darling G, CAR
43 Games played 43
23 Wins 13
14 Losses 21
2 Shutouts 0
1,187 Shots against 1,171
1,075 Saves 1,040
112 Goals against 131
0.906 Save % 0.888
2.73 Goals against average 3.18
Expected goals, while he was in net
102.9 Expected goals against 108.3
-9.1 Goals saved above expected -22.7
-0.22 Saved above expected per 60 -0.55
6.3% Chance per attempt faced 6.5%
Rating, in goals
+1.4 Goals above replacement -11.6
+0.2 Wins above replacement -1.9
Contract
$3.3M Cap hit $4.15M
$941K Worth at the going rate -$2M
-$2.4M Value: worth minus cap hit -$6.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean