Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Cam Ward Cam Talbot

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCam Ward: Save %, 0.909, 31st percentileCam Ward: Goals against, 2.35 a game, 53rd percentileCam Ward: Workload, 25.8 shots a game, 16th percentileCam Ward: Games, 52 games, 69th percentileCam Ward: Goals saved, -0.04 above expected per 60, 40th percentileCam Talbot: Save %, 0.917, 52nd percentileCam Talbot: Goals against, 2.45 a game, 40th percentileCam Talbot: Workload, 29.4 shots a game, 82nd percentileCam Talbot: Games, 56 games, 76th percentileCam Talbot: Goals saved, +0.06 above expected per 60, 60th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Cam Ward G, CHI 2015-16 Cam Talbot G, CBJ
52 Games played 56
23 Wins 21
17 Losses 27
1 Shutouts 3
1,343 Shots against 1,648
1,221 Saves 1,511
122 Goals against 137
0.909 Save % 0.917
2.41 Goals against average 2.55
Expected goals, while he was in net
119.9 Expected goals against 140.3
-2.1 Goals saved above expected +3.3
-0.04 Saved above expected per 60 +0.06
6.3% Chance per attempt faced 6.2%
Rating, in goals
+10.1 Goals above replacement +17.6
+1.7 Wins above replacement +2.9
Contract
$6.3M Cap hit $1.45M
$3M Worth at the going rate $4.8M
-$3.3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean